MTV recently released My College Dollars, a financial aid application on the popular social networking site that helps students fill out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) forms and gives them information on other available scholarships.

The app provides students with star-studded informational (and inspirational) videos—starring Jason Derulo, for instance—with information about state and federal aid; it also automatically alerts students about scholarships based on their Facebook information

My College Dollars is not replacing governmental services, but is working to bring the information and resources to more people. The app provides FAFSA information and contacts for more assistance, as well as a thorough explanation of the processes of FAFSA, scholarships, and other aid programs.

The scholarship listings number in the hundreds, from general art and science scholarships to major-specific awards. A student majoring in aerospace, for example, would find results on both general science scholarship and ones related to aerospace on My College Dollars. Some searches will still garnish 250 results, but the app links to College Board where such a search can be further refined.

Both high school graduates and current college students can search scholarships by state, minority status, and gender. The options for minority status however are not completely inclusive: there is no option for multiracial students.

Other problems exist in an “ethnic background” box where nationalities such as Chinese and Japanese are named but not others like Korean or Thai. Like any new site, there are always ways to improve. My College Dollars could take a few straightforward steps to make the app more inclusive and appeal to a greater audience.

My College Dollars must be able to truly make a difference in the lives of students who use the app, if it fails to provide results, future aspiring college students will have look for help elsewhere. It’s great that a major company like MTV is investing in America’s next generation—especially when so many students don’t even know how to access the resources to apply for college aid.

My College Dollars will work to help expand the reach of federal aid. By reaching more students, and providing them with resources to help them attain higher education, MTV could move the bar set by College Board and college prep companies up a notch.

College assistance has now flowed into the social networking stream—whether My College Dollars succeeds or not. 

Rep. David Rivera (R-Fla.) introduced the bill, called the Adjusted Residency for Military Service Act (ARMS Act) last month, and it’s already causing a stir among American immigration advocates.

The bill takes the DREAM Act, which would provide a path to citizenship for undocumented young people who pursue higher education or military service, and removes the clause allowing immigrant youth to become citizens through education.

In December 2010, the DREAM Act passed the House by a vote of 216-198, but failed in the Senate by five votes due to a lack of bipartisan support.

“If somebody is willing to die for America, then certainly they deserve a chance at life in America,” Rivera told the Miami Herald.

But many immigration-reform supporters find this bill troubling.

Ai Noorani, the executive director of the National Immigration Forum, described the ARMS Act as a “distortion of the DREAM Act.”

Some reformers argue excluding legalization through military service would give undocumented youth the wrong incentives for enlisting. It’s dignified to enlist voluntarily and such a move should be applauded, they say, but there are other ways to serve your country and benefit the American economy.

And some say the ARMS Act would send the wrong message to American citizens and the rest of the world by valuing military service over the education of the country’s future leaders.

Policymakers and education officials frequently discuss how the United States can improve its education ranks in relation to the rest of the world and part of the solution lies in the DREAM Act. Many undocumented youth are motivated and dedicated to leading successful lives and being productive American citizens.

These immigrants are young people with budding potential to develop the U.S. workforce and middle class. Denying them a right to citizenship is only detrimental to the U.S. society and economy.

The federal appeals court found itself in the national spotlight after delivering a high profile ruling in which it upheld a decision to strike down California’s controversial Proposition 8, which outlawed same-sex marriage in the state.

The decision caused a frenzy, crashing the court’s website within minutes of the announcement, and Prop. 8 instantly became one of the top trending topics on Twitter.

There’s no doubt that the decision is welcome news for California’s same-sex couples who saw their right to marriage revoked when Prop 8 narrowly passed four years ago.

But the decision may not be as far-reaching as marriage equality advocates would have liked.

Some policy experts are skeptical that the ruling will have any significant impact outside of California, as the court’s opinion may have been too narrowly tailored.

Indeed, the Ninth Circuit largely ignored the sweeping language employed by District Judge Vaughn Walker when Prop 8 was rejected the first time.

Walker deemed the ballot proposition unconstitutional on the grounds that “tradition alone … cannot form the basis of a rational law.”

Such a rationale, if used by a federal court, would have effectively rendered unconstitutional any state law banning gay marriage. The Ninth Circuit instead struck down Prop 8 because it took away rights that same-sex couples enjoyed prior to its enactment, heavily citing precedent established in the Supreme Court’s decision in Romer v. Evans.

The difference is critical.

The court’s decision can only be used as precedent in cases where same-sex couples were previously granted marriage rights and then had them rescinded, which is not the situation in the overwhelming majority of the 44 states that do not allow same-sex marriage.

The court’s saving grace may lie in the strong likelihood that the Supreme Court will ultimately review the ruling. Should the high court agree to hear the case, it would have the opportunity to reject Prop 8 using a much broader rationale that could potentially legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. Conversely, however, the Court could choose to uphold Prop 8—a decision that would be a devastating setback for the LGBT community—or decide not to hear arguments.

The Ninth Circuit’s ruling on Prop 8 should certainly celebrated—but with a caveat, as the specific language of the decision does little to advance the cause of marriage equality on a national level.

Reid was the commanding officer on the scene, and is featured in a viral YouTube video of an Occupy DC protester who was tased in the back last week.

I was just one of many on the scene who were knocked into a thronging crowd of people when the riot cops’ dispersal orders stopped agreeing with the laws of physics and the Park Police’s orderly quasi-eviction of the Occupy encampment took a shockingly violent turn.

Around 4:30 on Feb. 4, a number of occupiers decided to sit down in front of their camp’s library to prevent police from seizing it. Park Police’s Public Information Officer David Schlosser had previously issued a statement that the library would be spared—it had a flap open and didn’t contain sleeping paraphernalia, which gave it the OK under the no-camping regulations police and hazardous materials teams had been enforcing since dawn.

There had been a few clashes and arrests earlier in the day as officers cordoned off the park section by section, but occupiers seemed resigned by the afternoon as cleanup crews carefully bagged personal property for later retrieval and threw away what they deemed to be trash or a biohazard.

When Park Police officers prepared to inspect the library and ensure its compliance, though, occupiers weren’t ready to trust them. The officers had betrayed them too often that day, occupiers said, claiming that some empty tents that complied with the department’s rules were still confiscated.

No one was prepared for what followed. A line of Park Police officers in full riot gear encroached upon the crowd.

“Mooove back!” came the rhythmic call from one officer, though the directions weren’t clear. Who was he talking to? How far back was far back enough? I intended to stay as long as I lawfully could to film what happened, and I wasn’t alone.

Then officers said people who weren’t planning to sit down should leave. “Are you sitting or leaving?” they said. “Turn and move, turn and move.”

Except for one problem—a lot of people had nowhere to turn or move.

I had virtually no options. To my left was a metal barricade with police on the other side of it. Behind me was a crowd of people and the camp’s information tent. On the right, a perpendicular phalanx of officers was boxing in the crowd. A narrow sidewalk was the only route way possible, but most of that was also being blocked by officers or other occupiers.

“We’re trying to exit,” one photographer said repeatedly in response to dispersal orders who was blocked from doing so by two merging police lines.

Still, the demands to “turn and move” continued. To emphasize this point, officers began shoving demonstrators and onlookers with their riot shields. And shoving. And shoving.

You’ll see in my video footage below that the young women next to me were pushing back against a cop’s riot shield after he started pushing. That wasn’t smart, and it certainly didn’t help the situation. Still, a couple of unarmed, 5-foot-tall girls are hardly a match for a cop in full riot gear, and I’d at least question whether using batons on them, as this officer did, was the best way to de-escalate things and get them to disperse.

When the shoving match next to me became more intense, I realized I should try harder to get out of there—but Sgt. Reid didn’t give me the chance. He and another officer came towards me, seemingly out of nowhere, sticking batons in my face and yelling “Back up!”

I had about two seconds to back away and try to comply before Reid jabbed me backwards with his baton, and another few seconds to get jostled around in the crowd and scream for help before Reid sent me sprawling into the mass of people behind me with another baton-aided shove to my back.

I panicked. People die in crowds like this, I thought. I screamed, and flailed, and screamed some more, until some kind person pulled me up and some others calmed me down and helped me move away from the scene.

(I filed an official complaint against Sgt. Reid with the Park Police’s Internal Affairs department, and they have been responsive to my request. However, officials said they cannot provide any official information on this incident.)

Below is my video footage of what happened.

There’s another view of my tumble—and a better picture of the general disarray that kept people who wanted to leave from doing so—in Eddie Becker’s video, which accompanied Jefferson Morley’s excellent Salon article about what happened on Feb. 4 (the crackdown begins around 4:30). Morley also reported being shoved and sent sprawling by officers with riot shields. It turns out that I was standing right next to the two of them—indeed, I fell on top of poor Eddie.

My encounter was just the beginning of the mayhem.

Horse-mounted police joined the fray and terrified those in their path. Dozens of other people were knocked back, domino-style, with riot shields into crowds behind them or beaten with batons. People tripped over debris. Others cursed the cops and resisted moving back. One protester was knocked unconscious before being arrested. Another threw a full Coke bottle—not a brick, as previously reported—and seriously injured a police officer. Sgt. Reid had another shining moment trying to grab someone’s camera and push that person back when he was stuck against a fence, seen at 0:38 in this video.

Walking down the middle of K Street after all the occupiers had finally been pushed out of McPherson Square, you’d think a bomb had just gone off inside the park. People were screaming, crying, cursing, walking around in a daze, and hugging each other for comfort.

I passed one young man who was weeping after he’d been knocked down by police, another who had been hit in the head and was leaning on his friends, another in hysterics after having witnessed, he said, a 14-year-old girl being trampled by police. I heard similar accounts about the girl from half a dozen people, but haven’t yet found any reports of what happened.

Eleven people were arrested that day, including Jeremiah DeSousa, who was charged with assault with a deadly weapon for the Coke bottle incident. Protester Nathan Gorecky sustained head injuries and a broken arm before being arrested.

Without question, as at other encampments, there were protesters who acted out of line and deliberately failed to comply with police orders.

Still, the show of force by officers in this situation was sudden and shocking and executed with seemingly little concern for efficient de-escalation or peaceful dispersal.

Did police really take the word of one occupier, as seen in Becker’s video at Salon, who said people were unlikely to leave the camp peacefully, and then act under the assumption that everyone assembled there would refuse to disperse without force? Did the two dozen cops bussed in from New York City have anything to do with these stepped-up tactics? (Schlosser, the public information officer, hasn’t returned my calls about these questions.)

The incident is especially shocking because the Park Police have been the good guys. They were portrayed in the media as the easygoing officers used to enforcing First Amendment issues, the ones sticking up for the rights of demonstrators. And from what I’ve observed while covering this movement, that picture seemed pretty accurate.

“These guys [DC Park Police], for four months, didn’t write us any tickets,” said occupier Brian Eister on a live video stream last week, before the police action. “I fucking hate the cops—Oakland, LA, NYPD. But these are not those guys.”

A lot of occupiers I talked to might grumble about the “pigs,” as they’re sometimes called at encampments, but they’d still give the Park Police credit for treating demonstrators with respect and protecting their rights.

The tasing incident, which Sgt. Reid oversaw, caused that mutual respect to start to crumble. And after this forceful eviction, it will be much harder to repair. 

University of China—Washington? In order to make up for cuts in funding from state governments, many universities have turned to China to make up the loss of revenue. Schools such as the University of Washington have are increasingly recruiting foreign students (often Chinese applicants) instead of focusing on in-state students; such students pay more in tuition that in-staters. While school administrators say they recognize this trend has a direct impact on in-state students, the financial benefits of foreign students has proved too hard for some to pass up. [New York Times]

Best Value Schools. Students at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and the University of Virginia, among several other institutions, are receiving one of the top value educations among all public schools, according to a new report. The Princeton Review released its list of the “Best Value” public schools, revealing which public institutions are giving students the most bang for their buck. As recent discussions have highlighted both college affordability and the quality of higher education, schools on this list find themselves in an even better position than before. [Huffington Post]

Free MIT Education? Professors from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology recently announced the creation of an open source education program at the prestigious school. Known as MITx, the program will provide free and open access to online course content that, with completion, can lead to participants receiving a certificate from the school. In an interview with The Chronicle of Higher Education, two of the professors behind the idea—L. Rafael Reif, the school’s provost, and Anant Agarwal, director of MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory— said they’re not concerned about any negative impact the new model could have on traditional colleges. “If it does [become a threat], then the residential model has to get better,” Reif said. [Chronicle of Higher Education]

Karen Handel resigned on Tuesday; she was the group’s vice president for public policy. Handel was a Republican candidate in the Georgia gubernatorial race in 2010, when she made her anti-abortion sentiments clear, and condemned Planned Parenthood’s mission. In her resignation letter, Handel claims that a discussion about cutting funding from Planned Parenthood was already in the works when she joined Komen, noting the final decision was one that was “fully vetted by every appropriate level within the organization.”

“I am deeply disappointed by the gross mischaracterizations of the strategy, its rationale, and my involvement in it,” Handel wrote. “I openly acknowledge my role in the matter and continue to believe our decision was the best one for Komen’s future and the women we serve. … Neither the decision nor the changes themselves were based on anyone’s political beliefs or ideology.”

According to the Associated Press, an anonymous source with direct knowledge of the decision-making process at Komen said Handel was a driving force behind the granting strategy overhaul. The source told the AP that the new rubric used when making the funding decision was crafted with Planned Parenthood’s exclusion in mind. Information on how the new granting changes impacted Planned Parenthood was also highlighted, the source told the AP.

Handel declined to take a severance package from Komen. She’s slated to speak with reporters in Atlanta this afternoon.

Human Rights Watch condemned the practice earlier this month, and an article in Mother Jones last week drew attention stateside. But while the Mother Jones article referred to the U.S.’s fairly backwards practices, the American media has largely ignored that the same sterilization requirements exist, albeit in a different form, across this country.

Every state except for Iowa explicitly requires a surgeon’s letter proving that a person has undergone “sexual reassignment surgery” in order to change the gender on a person’s birth certificate. Sixteen states require the same surgery to change the gender marker on official identification documents, such as driver’s licenses.

The rationale is different, but the result is the same: Most transgender Americans who want every government document to match their gender will be required to have a surgery that renders them sterile. 

“Sexual reassignment surgery” is the term most commonly used in state restrictions. As the ACLU has noted, it is a vague term:

What the law means by “surgical treatment” is unclear. In many cases, a letter from a doctor documenting that one has completed all the recommended medical treatment for “altering one’s body and appearance” or “a gender transition” is enough.

However, these kinds of ambiguous notes by doctors are used to circumvent the reality that many authorities—including those in Louisiana and in Kansas, who explicitly reject mastectomies and breast augmentation as sufficient—want transgender Americans to have undergone genital surgery.

Genital surgery for transgender men and women is quite different, but both procedures are monumentally expensive and render patients infertile, though transgender men can have their eggs frozen, if they’re willing to pay several thousands of dollars more.

To make matters worse, there are three states that never allow an alteration to the sex on a birth certificate. Trans people born in Ohio, Idaho, or Tennessee may change the sex marker on their license in more amenable states, but can never have a birth certificate that aligns with their experienced gender.

Thanks to new Obama administration guidelines, transgender Americans can change the sex on their passports without undergoing surgery. Passports can then be used as an identifying document when applying for a new license, circumventing some state restrictions. Still, trans Americans are often stuck with official documents with mismatched gender and sex markers.

In the end, America isn’t better than Sweden on transgender rights—we’re just less effective at enforcing the same horrific policies. 

Sheen is back, after a bit of a hiatus from acting when he was fired from his show Two and a Half Men, with a new show that makes fun of the gravity of his past—and his abusive history.

The new show, called Anger Management, will be a spin-off of sorts of the film Anger Management, originally starring Adam Sandler and Jack Nicholson, about the unusual relationship between a man sentenced to anger management therapy and his therapist. The series has three leads aside from Sheen—all women. They are his therapist (who will become his love interest—as if that’s ethical), his ex-wife, and his daughter.

Fox President John Landgraf said he anticipates potential fallout from the series, but said that Sheen deserves another chance with his own TV show. “I believe in redemption,” Landgraf said.

Sheen has a reputation for being, well, angry. He was famously fired from his hit show Two and a Half Men in 2011 after making anti-Semitic comments about the show’s creator Chuck Lorre. But what few talked about is how he also has a reputation for allegedly abusing women. Sheen has domestic abuse charges against him going back more than twenty years to 1990 when he shot his girlfriend, which he says was an accident.

Sheen went on a well-publicized tirade of strange behavior after his firing, including bizarre interviews and tweets where he famously coined his catchphrase “winning.” After this public meltdown, Piers Morgan interviewed Sheen in a “special live edition” of his news program. It was 43 minutes into the interview before Morgan asked Sheen if he had ever hit a woman. Sheen responds: “I have not. No. Women are not to be hit; they are to be hugged and caressed.”

When Morgan pressed him, Sheen conceded: “I’m sorry, there was an incident years ago, and everybody thought I hit her. I was trying to contain her. I had her arms, and we both went to the ground ... her initials are B.A.”

Attorney Gloria Allred responded in a statement that B.A. is her client Brittany Ashland. Allred called Sheen’s comments “revolting and despicable” because “[Sheen] failed to state that he was charged with one count of battery with serious injury of my client, Brittany Ashland. … He entered a plea of no contest to that charge. No contest has the same effect as a guilty plea for his crime.”

Sheen summarized the altercation on CNN by stating: “I felt terrible … she was attacking me …” In his interview with Morgan, Sheen also denied that anything happened during an incident in 2009 when he was arrested on “charges of felony second-degree assault, felony menacing and a misdemeanor charge of criminal mischief after allegedly strangling, holding a knife to the throat of, and threatening to kill then-wife Brooke Mueller” in Aspen, Colo.

Sheen said on CNN: “The scoreboard doesn’t lie. The Aspen thing was thrown out. The judge was like, get this guy out of my county, he brings too much press with him.”

In fact, Sheen pleaded guilty to third-degree domestic violence in a plea deal, and ended up serving thirty days at a rehab center—although, he still got to work on Two and a Half Men while serving that time.

Viewers of Fox’s new sitcom are supposed to see a man with “anger management” problems surrounded by attractive women. The audience—who can see that this man is clearly Charlie Sheen—is supposed to laugh at him being unable to control his anger, something he’s allegedly struggled with seriously in the past and has reportedly caused serious problems.

As further proof that the audience is supposed to associate Sheen with the actual character he is playing, Fox hasn’t even bothered to change his name—Sheen’s character is named Charlie—and isn’t it funny that Charlie gets a little mad sometimes? In his usual style, Sheen promised that his new show will be “an absolute f----n' rocket ship to the moon."

Making light of Sheen’s abusive past and irrational behavior by pinning the title Anger Management on it and turning it into a sitcom is irresponsible and demonstrative of the callous lack of gravity some place on the abuse of women.

“We’re a network that likes to take risks,” FX president John Landgraf said recently. Risks like giving a man convicted of domestic abuse on several occasions a comedy show about how being uncontrollably angry is actually funny?

During his time on Two and a Half Men, Sheen was the highest paid actor in television, making $1.2 million per episode. His new show is set to premiere in June.

Swedish fashion retailer H&M introduced its “Beckham Bodywear” line with a 30-second spot during the big game that placed the soccer star-heartthrob front and center in nothing but his underwear.

Reaction to the ad was mixed, but most viewers moved on to the next entertaining Super Bowl commercial. Martin, however, couldn’t seem to let it go.

Immediately after the ad aired, Martin tweeted: “Ain’t no real bruhs going to H&M to buy some damn David Beckham underwear! #superbowl”

So maybe Beckham’s new clothing line just wasn’t to Martin’s liking, and the tweet was an innocent way of expressing that? The political commentator upped the ante in another tweet two minutes later:

If a dude at your Super Bowl party is hyped about David Beckham’s H&M underwear ad, smack the ish out of him! #superbowl.

Martin faced immediate backlash for the tweets. One Twitter user asked if it’s acceptable for him to define masculinity for everyone else, to which Martin responded, “Yes. Deal with it!”

While Martin claims his tweets weren’t anti-gay, a quick look at his Twitter page suggests otherwise. Earlier Sunday he tweeted: “Who the hell was that New England Patriot they just showed in a head to toe pink suit? Oh, he needs a visit from #teamwhipdatass” And several weeks ago he tweeted: “Ladies, if your man don’t like sports, send his azz back to the factory. He came to you defective! #rolandsrules.”

In a video shot during the 2008 presidential campaign, Martin said that the Democrats had to make room in their party for anti-gay evangelicals, saying that gays had too much influence over Barack Obama.

There are several more tweets and comments that we could include here, but the point is clear. Even though some of the remarks were made in jest, Martin continues to imply that there’s something wrong with men who aren’t masculine enough by his definition. LGBT advocacy groups, including GLAAD, have already launched an online petition calling for him to be fired.

Martin has since backed off, claiming his tweets about the Beckham ad were anti-soccer and not anti-gay.

That claim is almost as laughable as Martin’s own fashion endeavors. 

Lost And Found. A 22-year-old Brown University student uncovered a piece of history while digging through university archives. Malcolm Burnley, the editor of The College Hill Independent, a member of the Campus Progress journalism network, uncovered a half-century old audiotape of a speech given by Malcolm X during a campus visit to Brown in 1961. “No one had listened to this in 50 years,” Burnley said. “There aren’t many recordings of him before 1962.” While the discovery alone is enough for a good story, Burnley also discovered that one of the students in the audience was the late Richard Holbrooke. The famous American diplomat was the college’s newspaper editor at the time and, according to Burnley’s findings, was influential in bringing Malcolm X to campus.  [Politico]

Occupy The Classroom. A Chicago college is now offering a course on the Occupy movement. More than 30 students have enrolled in Roosevelt University’s “Occupy Everywhere” class—a political science course that examines how the movement started last summer in New York and spread nationwide. Some of the assignments include reading the movement’s newspaper and attending Occupy Chicago’s general assembly meetings. No word yet if students will have to camp out in tents. [FOX News]

Equality Louisiana Summit. LGBT student groups from Louisiana State University and other colleges gathered in Lafayette over the weekend for the Equality Louisiana Summit. The summit focused on lobbying for legislation to prevent bullying in schools and solidified connections among the different student organizations. The conference was held about a month before the Louisiana legislature is scheduled to reconvene, and several attendees indicated that the various LGBT groups will aggressively push for anti-bullying legislation. [The Daily Reveille]

“Brain drain” is a phenomenon in which the best-trained individuals flee the society where they originated to escape poor conditions or to seek better ones. In the contemporary world, the term is most frequently associated with well-educated individuals fleeing the developing world instead of staying to contribute.

But by failing to provide a path to citizenship for well-prepared young immigrants, the United States risks losing the most highly-trained, valuable members of the undocumented population—either to another workforce, or to unskilled work or unemployment here at home.

A new rule approved by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board requires institutions to send annual reminders encouraging undocumented students receiving in-state tuition to apply for permanent residency status. But undocumented students who were brought to the country as children have little chance of gaining residency under the current system.

Those who made a point to pursue a college degree in spite of the fact that current law forbids them from working in a skilled sector are clearly among the most talented and motivated. Neglecting that group is a loss, especially in the face of contemporary higher education attrition in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

In his most recent State of the Union address, President Obama called for new rules that would allow talented undocumented youth to fulfill their potential.

“If election-year politics keeps Congress from acting on a comprehensive plan, let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people who want to staff our labs, start new businesses, defend this country,” Obama said. “Send me a law that gives them the chance to earn their citizenship. I will sign it right away.”

Obama directed the comments at Congress because there is a clear legislative answer to the problem. The DREAM Act would provide a path to citizenship through education or military service for individuals who grew up in the United States but are not documented residents.

The DREAM Act wouldn't just save a valuable work sector. It would also be a humane measure that gives all undocumented young people a dignified, gainful course of action to achieve citizenship.

“Watching a hippie protester get tased just makes my day,” Erickson said during his radio show The Erick Erickson Show. “ [The video] is just made of awesome.”

Erickson mentioned, in passing, the protester’s hospitalization due to “a medical condition.” Witnesses on the scene said the protester, called “Lash,” appeared to be having a seizure after having been tased in the back.

Ha! Erickson is right—hospitalization and human suffering are hilarious!

Here’s the video of the arrest. Erickson wouldn’t play it on his show to spare his gentle listeners all the “f-bombs.” One mustn’t curse in front of the children—after all, it distracts them from learning how to hate their neighbor.

The video shows Lash—who had been theatrically tearing down no-camping notices and causing a scene, but not threatening anyone—being surrounded by three police officers. He starts to panic, says “Why are you coming at me?” and “I’ve done nothing wrong!” and then tries to back away from the police. He isn’t lashing out at the officers—he’s arguably resisting arrest, but not violently.

After two of the officers already have him secured by the arms, the third shoots him with her taser gun, eliciting cries of shock and curses from onlookers.

Nearby protesters shout: “He wasn’t being violent!” and “Shame!”

To them, and to many who saw the video and spread it virally, it was a horrific act of unnecessary violence.

To Erickson, it was entertainment.

Erickson is no stranger to making callous, tasteless, or inaccurate remarks. This is the guy who called former Supreme Court Justice David Souter a “goat-fucking child molester,” said feminists are “too ugly to date,” and suggested people might be justified in beating state legislators to a “bloody pulp” over regulations.

But this is about more than outrageous comments. It’s about contributing to a culture of rhetorical violence where schadenfreude is celebrated and where people who disagree with you deserve to suffer.

As Conor Friedersdorf wrote at The Atlantic:

Guys like Erickson demonize their political and ideological opponents with hateful rhetoric. They're cast as malign, even less than human. It's that same mindset—seeing protesters as malign, even less than human—that leads to police so quickly and needlessly using violence against them.

It’s just one more example of how vitriol corrodes compassion and turns suffering into sport.