Crunching the Numbers
Students are adding small fees onto their tuition to make a big impact on the environment.By Tristan Fowler
December 5, 2008
Wind turbines in Wasco, Oregon (AP Photo/Don Ryan, File)All those environmental studies majors out there should consider getting a minor in accounting or financing, because the future of "Going Green" has become a numbers game. The upfront costs of energy efficient renovations, LEED-certified buildings, and renewable energy credits can be encumbering to the campus sustainability coordinators and staggering to students in the local environmental club. Late last month, Alfred State College installed a 5.1 kilowatt photovoltaic grid intertie system. It cost $45,000. The University of Saskatchewan is replacing 26,000 light fixtures with energy-efficient bulbs at a cost of $1.9 million over three years. So what can a recession-era institution with Ramen noodle-eating students do? Just follow the example of over 25 campuses that are barely raising their tuition rates, and reaping huge benefits.
Rachel Barge, a 2008 grad from University of California–Berkley, has started a consulting company, Campus InPower, which provides funding ideas for college students. During her undergrad at University of California Berkley, Barge helped run a successful green fee campaign, raising the tuition by $5 per student. The minor fees added up to between $170,000 and $200,000 each year for sustainable projects. A committee of students, faculty and administrators decide how to best use the funds. The funding has paid for educational programming, created a native plant nursery, and built a campus-wide resource monitoring system.
Many colleges and universities are using the money to buy their electricity from wind and solar power. At University of California–Santa Cruz, 69 percent of the student body voted to have a $3 per quarter fee increase to purchase renewable energy. The fee generates $135,000 every year. With this student money, the university is operating on 100 percent renewable energy.
In some cases, students have decided the best way to use their bucks is in a revolving loan fund. The idea is that energy and resource efficient upgrades save money. With that extra savings, students and administrators can reinvest into more efficiencies. Macalester College, in St. Paul, Minnesota, established a $27,000 fund in early 2006 with funds from the student government and the Environmental studies program, and they have a goal of increasing the fund to $100,000. Anyone or any group can offer a proposal, which they will receive all the extra savings after the initial loan and interest are reimbursed.
Eco-minded students and administrators will continue to crunch the numbers, but here are a few more numbers to keep in mind. This week, more than 600 college and universities have pledged to make their campus carbon neutral through the American College & University Presidential Climate Commitment. And with more than 7,000 students who attended PowerShift ’07 in Washington, D.C., it certainly appears the numbers are shifting in favor of the environment.
Tristan Fowler is an Intern at Science Progress and a senior at Ithaca College.
Social Bookmarking
--------
Comments
I like the idea of student control over add-on fees, but if students had a say in how the rest of the tuition was spent, I’d wager you wouldn’t even need to tack on a fee to get Green priorities funded. That seems like the next logical campaign – a truly participatory university budget.
— ForStudentPower - Dec 6, 12:11 PM - #Its true, we are shifting this nation! Now its time to bring on the power. Come be a part of history! www.powershift09.org
— Ethan Nuss - Dec 12, 09:49 AM - #