Now that the votes have been tallied and the editorials written in most major newspapers, I will add my two cents on the elections. I just don't see it as that bad.
After all, Arafat's party did not spring up nonviolently. As an organization Hamas is far better organized, more populist and less corrupt than Fatah. Over and over, people are quoted acknowledging that Hamas is "closer" to the people with its financial and social support. However, with that support comes a theocratic agenda and its violent revolutionary rhetoric/actions.
But, now that Hamas has gained a parliamentary majority, the party must look to politics to solve their problems. If Hamas continues to call for the destruction of Israel, the party leadership will have squandered the enormous opportunity given to them. Due to the stict structure of Hamas, arguably, violence will be easier to control IF there is the political will to control it.
If Hamas chooses the path of moderation, thereby renouncing its call for the destruction of Israel and pledging its support for a peaceful two state solution, the ball will have succesfully moved to the Israeli's court. Then it will be up to the Labor party and Kadima (Sharon's new party) to back up their words with actions.
Of course, I understand this is a somewhat glossy summarization, but I would be curious to know what everyone thinks about the impact of the elections.
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
Posts
!
