Diamonds vs. Pearls
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

The biggest scandal from last night’s Democratic presidential debate has nothing to do with driver’s licenses for undocumented immigrants, universal healthcare or Pakistan.

Instead, everybody’s talking about Maria Luisa, the student who used the debate’s precious final question to ask Hillary Clinton if she prefers pearls or diamonds:

 

This is obviously a ridiculous question—but turns out it wasn’t the one Maria wanted to ask. Several of the questions she submitted to CNN were approved, and she was going to ask Clinton about the Yucca Mountain Repository, but CNN employees chose the diamonds/pearls question and pressured her to ask it to close the debate.

So even though she submitted the dumb question, at least Maria had her priorities in order until CNN got its claws in her. And I have to say, her self-defense message on MySpace is a pretty bad-ass takedown of CNN:

See, the media chose what they wanted, not what the people or audience really wanted. That's politics; that's reality. So, if you want to read about real issues important to America--and the whole world, I suggest you pick up a copy of the Economist or the New York Times or some other independent source. If you want me to explain to you how the media works, I am more than happy to do so. But do not judge me or my integrity based on that question.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Ha!
By N.Raider Nov 16th 2007 at 11:10 pm EST
Ms. Luisa needs to check her facts if she thinks that the New York Times is "independent." I do not bother reading news published in the United States anymore (unless it's for laughs). Everything has the same slant/censorship. We need to rely on grassroots reporting and commentary like Campus Progress if we are to ever break free of the corporate agenda being portrayed on all American media outlets.
Re: Ha!
By Superduperficial Nov 17th 2007 at 11:05 pm EST
As opposed to? News everywhere has a slant of some sort or another. However slanted the NYT is, the BBC is worse.

Slanted reporting can be some of the best, though. See Hunter S. Thompson, or The Exile.
Re: Ha!
By JR Nov 18th 2007 at 2:20 am EST
You know, this has got to be the fifth or sixth time I've seen you call the BBC slanted without substantiation. Your usual response when I call you on it is to write something along the lines or "BWAHAHAHA oh you're being serious?" or "ORLY?"

The Daily Telegraph is slanted. The Sunday Times is slanted. The Guardian is slanted. And, notably, they all openly admit their slant.

So what's it saying that the BBC sells itself as "free from both political and commercial influence and answers only to its viewers and listeners?" Either they're liars, or they're actually more interested in providing information than turning a profit.

Now, if you want to call them out for lying, it would help if you did more than just continually repeat the charge without backing it up. But I've been here over two years, and I'm still waiting.

So, I guess what I'm trying to say is: put up or shut up, pal.
  
Not even the worst offense!
By Eli Corp Nov 17th 2007 at 1:21 am EST
Thats not even the worst of the whole Nevada debate chaos. The whole pre-screening of the audience in general, not allowing college students at UNLV to have more than a couple hundred tickets, and a sudden unexplained change in venue to the Cox Pavilion which seats 90% less than the nearby Thomas and Mack Center all contributed to a very "undemocratic" debate in Las Vegas. I was appalled at the way the debate was conducted, the booing the protesters, the moderator, the changing of the audiences questions by the moderators. Total and utter bias towards Sen. Clinton. Unbelieveable!
  
what was she thinking?
By Justin Elliott Nov 17th 2007 at 1:49 am EST
Annika, I think you're going a bit too easy on Maria Luisa here. Yeah, the Myspace thing was a nice little rebuttal, but it's hard to get away from the fact that she asked the egregious question. She's obviously an intelligent grown-up, so why allow herself to be a vessel for this kind of b.s.?
  
what a ridic question
By lauren Nov 17th 2007 at 4:42 am EST
i got so pissed when i heard this. i can't even think of a question that's a "male-based equivalent". Boxers or briefs perhaps.. or whatever it's just a stupid question.
Re: what a ridic question
By Annika Nov 19th 2007 at 11:23 am EST
I've heard this gripe in a couple places--that no one asks male candidates ridiculous questions like this--but there are plenty of weird, personal questions to go around.

In 1992, a student asked Bill Clinton the infamous "boxers or briefs" question in an MTV/Rock the Vote debate and no one seems to remember it.

Link
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress