Newsflash: Abstinence-Only Sex Ed is Pointless
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

According to a study by the nonpartisan National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, abstinence-only sex ed has no effect on the sexual practices of teenagers.

And, according to the researcher, comprehensive sex ed programs

improved teens' knowledge about the risks and consequences of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases and gave them greater "confidence in their ability to say 'no' to unwanted sex."

I had pretty fabulous sex ed at my public high school, and I'm always shocked when I hear about the ridiculous stuff that my friends observed in less competent programs--hearing about their experiences makes me realize how crucial it is to make comprehensive sex ed a priority in public education. This study is one more in a long line of reasons to ditch abstinence-only programs and instead respect high school students enough to offer them practical knowledge about sexual health.

via Feministing, naturally.


Reader Comments
  
obviously
By Jenny Odegard Nov 7th 2007 at 5:55 pm EST
Example:

I graduated with about 650 people from a public school with comprehensive sex ed. As far as I'm aware, we had about 4 pregnancies before graduation.

A friend from school who grew up in a smaller town with abstinence-only sex ed graduated with less than 70 people and knows of closer to 7 or 8 pregnancies.

Not an official study, but one real life example of the benefits to more information.
  
Agreed.
By Superduperficial Nov 7th 2007 at 7:04 pm EST
This is what happens when you entrust policy who think God tells you what to do with your naughty bits.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress