Post from Ben Adler's Blog:
High and Low Lights from the Roosevelt Institution Policy Expo
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

I stopped by the Roosevelt Institution's policy expo today. Roosevelt, the first student think tank, had a strong program featuring innovative policy ideas from undergraduates across the country. I was especially impressed by their three booklets of 25 ideas on a given topic. In particular, "25 ideas for increasing socio-economic diversity in higher education," presented by Campus Progress's own Zach Marks, had some really strong content. My personal favorite is the argument that colleges should be pressured to practice "wealth blind" admissions, which means that they would eliminate legacy preferences and recruiting for exclusive rich kid sports like squash in the admissions process.

On the downside, I was surprised and disappointed to see a note that the closing ceremony would include a speech by Doug Bailey. Best known for being the chief press flack for the uninspiring Gerald Ford's losing 1976 presidential campaign, Bailey is currently in the news for pushing Unity '08, the movement for a bi-partisan presidential ticket. Unity '08, the product of wanky, David Broder-ish elite handwringing over political polarization and the fetishization of bi-partisanship has been sufficiently revealed for the moronic joke it is on this site and elsewhere, so I won't rehash the takedown. I will only suggest that if an organization names itself after a great liberal president and portrays itself as promoting a progressive agenda, it should refrain from giving a platform to illiberal out of date figures and their silly hobbyhorses.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Wow
By Chris Jul 14th 2007 at 4:16 pm EDT
Wow what a stereotypical statement to say "exclusive rich kid sports like squash"

So does that mean we should have more basketball teams to promote African American admissions?
Re: Wow
By JR Jul 15th 2007 at 12:09 am EDT
Well, I spent 13 years in public education (not counting attending a public college), and I never once went to a school with a squash team.

Baskeball? Yes.
Baseball? Yes.
Football? Yes.
Soccer? Yes.
Golf? Sure.
Tennis? Yep.
Diving and swimming? Check.

Horse jumping? Not so much.
Squash? Nope.
Polo? Pol-no.

Why pretend like all sports are created equal, or at least are equally accessible to students?
  
word JR
By Ben Adler Jul 16th 2007 at 12:36 am EDT
Well said, and I'd also add that golf and tennis are largely inaccessible to people of more modest means or from more urban areas. It's a known fact, though, that squash in particular is a sport that appeals to admission officers because its an obvious proxy for wealth and offically need blind schools still want to make sure that they admit enough rich kids who don't need financial aid. This has been admitted by former admissions officers and reported in newspapers.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress