The conference has been going greienceat. I've
been meeting students with interesting stories and
backgrounds, focused on the same issues as I
am.
As the speakers so far have emphasized, our
generation is finally combining all the progessive
issues into one movement. Even now I feel like I'm
a part of something bigger and greater that I had
realized.
When I transfer to Orlando and a larger campus, I
hope to be even more active than I have been
thusfar.
When I think of what being a progressive means, I
believe that it means you are not necessarily
aligned with any one political party. Instead, you
advocate and believe in policies that will raise
up and help all people, regardless of race,
socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation,
etc. Being a progressive means that you take
consideration of others’ situation, not just
your own when formulating a policy. Similarly, a
progressive believes in policies that enhance the
collective good, rather than the good of a few
individuals.
Progressive- A political movement that has as its
root and primary purpose securing economic justice
for the governed. It has a long history in
America, manifested in both “causes”
and dedicated political parties. These causes
include such great accomplishments as
emancipation, where economic exploitation was the
root purpose behind slavery; voting and equal
rights for women where again, economic
exploitation was at the core of discrimination
against women, restrictions on child labor and
providing labor organizing rights where
exploitation was the core social evil to be
overcome.
In the contemporary scene, The progressive
movement is associated with such economic justice
reforms as ending the domination of public policy
and the entire political process by corporations
and the wealthy class in America, labor rights to
collectively bargain and provision of a living
wage, tax policy reform which fairly distributes
the tax burden between individual citizens and
corporations, and fair distribution of government
services and expenditures to the human needs of
ordinary citizens first and commercial
organizations as a second priority if choices are
to be made. And domestic needs of citizens first
above all other priorities which are set by
legislative and executive public policy
priorities. Solutions sought are most often
systemic change or reform.
Populism- A parallel political movement in America
which emphasizes the needs of working, low and
moderate income people. In early American history
this movement had its origins in rural America. In
Texas, the populist movement addressed the rights
of ranchers and land owners in west Texas vs. the
aggressive “takings” of land in
development of railroads, supported by government.
In east Texas the populist movement had its roots
in usury in bank lending practices with small
farmers and landowners. In both cases both
corporations and supporting government
administrations were the object of criticism and
citizen revolt. In the contemporary situation,
Texas political office-holders such as Rep. Wright
Patman, Sen. Ralph Yarbrough, Agriculture
Commissioner Jim Hightower and Attorney General
Jim Mattox self identified as Populists, as does
candidate David Van Os.
Liberalism- In contrast to progressivism,
liberalism, in the domestic application emphasizes
social justice issues, often without addressing
the core economic injustice underpinnings of
worker, racial, gender and sexual discrimination.
Solutions sought in the liberal paradigm more
often are exemplified in legislation or legal
remedies to restore or improve rights and equal
access. In contract, progressivism typically seeks
systemic change or reform, again with first
emphasis on economic justice.
My gut reaction, non-analytically speaking, is the
thing that most defines progressives and sets them
apart is their conception of the past and future.
i.e. We see problems and lessons in the past that
move us to imagine a future-improved. Conversely,
conservatives live up to their name and look to
the past as the halycon days of society, desiring
to conserve as much as possible from a dead
romanticized era.
Progressives believe in maximizing human freedom
and helping society (and its individual members)
achieve their full potential. To that end,
progressives believe that all of society's members
must have access to education, health care, and
economic necessities in order to fully contribute
to democracy, the economy, and society as a whole.
Power, wealth, and information must flow freely
rather than be concentrated in the hands of a few
so that all of its citizens have the means to
contribute.
Alternatively, you could say that progressives
believe in progress (i.e. change) and oppose
anything that makes society rigid--that is, not
changing (smash the power!).
Progressive, to me, gets at a certain willingness
to do things like mix potato chips with a salad.
In a word, a word that is incredibly inefficient,
progressivism is experimentalism of the finest,
inasmuch as it denotes a certain fearlessness that
is constantly and necessarily reinforced by good
sense. A progressive skier is unafraid to huck a
40 ft. cliff, but a progressive skier wears a
helmet. A progressive road-tripper (that most
respected of professions) is unafraid to cross the
continent, but a progressive road-tripper sticks
an extra bottle of motor oil in the bed of the
pick-up. A progressive Metro-rider is unafraid to
walk through an open turnstile, but a progressive
Metro-rider makes sure it's during rush hour -
that way it's guaranteed no one will notice.
Progressives are unafraid, but they clothe their
fearlessness in a (stylish) rain-coat of
pragmatism.
Paul Begala said it best during the morning
panel discussion: we need "progressive
patriotism."
As you noted Andrew, progressives have for too
long been repeatedly and unfairly bereaved of
the
notion of loving our country.
The term and the exemplification of
"progressive
patriotism" bridges this gap between what we
know progressive values to be true to and with
today's political realities. Above all, our
values
seek
to build a stronger society through
stronger
communities, pragmatic solutions, and a
vision
of hope and enduring freedom. Indeed, it is
nation-building in the term's utmost sense.
An ending quote from Wittgenstein: that a
thread's
strength "does not reside in the fact that
some
one fibre runs through its whole length, but
in
the overlapping of many fibers."
progressivism, at least my version of it, is
willing to make big changes. in that way it's
a
kind of radicalism -- and although it's always
tiresome to go through this explanation,
"radical"
comes from the latin "rad" which means "to get
at
the root of." liberalism is content with the
status quo, allowing small social programs to
serve as band-aids for larger social malaise.
for instance: social security and related
programs
were the some of the first true "progressive"
policies enacted on the federal level. up to
that
point liberals had been content with
faith-based
charity, almshouses, orphanages, soup
kitchens,
etc. but the progressives in the 1930s,
drawing
on
the socialist and communist movements in that
and
earlier decades, decided that people in a
community had a responsibility to support each
other over and above what the wealthiest
members'
philanthropy could support.
similarly, the fight for the eight-hour
workday,
the weekend and the right to collective
bargaining
that was undertaken by labor unions,
socialists
and anarchists at the end of the nineteenth
century pressured state and eventually the
federal
government to enact progressive law codifying
these rights.
what we are searching for, however, is a new
kind
of progressivism. we shouldn't be flip about
the
shortcomings of progressivism in the twentieth
century. woodrow wilson had a vision in the
league
of nations, but he was also an avowed racist.
teddy roosevelt broke up the big combines and
monopolies, but he also led an imperialist war
that had lasting effects for nearly a century.
these aren't just character flaws, either.
this
understanding of the world as something that
needed to be "saved," "civilized," "pacified,"
etc. was a defining element of progressivism,
from
william jennings bryan on up to john f.
kennedy.
what we're searching for -- or at least, what
i
hope we're searching for -- is a kind of
progressivism that seeks to empower people
rather
than simply doling out charity. (it's
important
to
note that the progenitors of corporate welfare
and
social darwinism can be traced directly to the
current "centrist" beliefs in faith-based
philanthropy and self-regulating business.)
at times, of course, it will be necessary to
enact
laws and protect rights: preserving
environmental
laws, shoring up affirmative action, opposing
the
same-sex marriage ban, finally passing an
equal
rights amendment including the right to an
abortion, etc.
most of what we should be spending our time
focusing on, however, is creating programs and
--
more importantly -- communities that
seek
to empower those who are systematically
disempowered in our society. we need to
endorse,
for instance:
- volunteer health clinics
- community arts programs
- sustainable farms and agriculture
- job-training programs
- after-school tutoring
- women's self-defense classes
- reliable sex education
- conflict resolution/alternative to violence
programs (avp)
- workers' collectives
- community-based community development
projects
i come from the rocky mountain west, where
libertarianism is a strong force. today it
mostly
shows up manifested in republican-party
affiliation, but it wasn't always that way.
progressivism was born in the west -- wyoming
was
the first place in the united states to allow
women to vote, in 1869. the example of
"bleeding
kansas" you already know. and the
western-state
system of easily-established citizen
initiatives,
referendums and resolutions -- the kind that
got
gray davis kicked out of office -- were
traditionally used for progressive ends, such
as
medical marijuana and euthanasia statutes in
oregon.
there are times when government, insofar as it
is
our current community of people, needs to be
able
to protect basic rights through law and basic
life
through funding. but by and large people are
willing to take care of each other, if given
the
chance. programs like the ones i outlined
above
have been started all over the united states
(not
to mention the world) to great success. if
progressives began collectively working toward
developing these sorts of things -- with or
without federal funding -- i think that we
could
increase the quality of life, especially in
disempowered communities, quite regardless of
whether the state is "red" or "blue."
I've always maintained the conservatives seek to
preserve the status quo at any cost, liberals try
to do the same but with a kinder-gentler approach,
while progressives are fully willing to toss any
system that doesn't result in genuine subtantive
solutions based on fundamentally human values. All
of that is essentially what Andrew's piece
says.
The only area where I would differ is near the
ending of his piece where he ties Progressive
values to being "American." Without knowing the
Andrew's age and being of an "older" generation
myself (Gen-X here: born between '63-'71), it's
very problematic and potentially dangerous to tie
human values as distinctly "American." An Asian,
African or European progressive would assuredly
agree that progessive values are not uniquely
"American." The era of
"nation-state"-as-"value-anchor" is long outdated
and is substantially the proximate cause of
considerable violence in the world today. Progress
means tossing that impractical system and opting
for a better one.
For me the values base that is most progressive,
and illuminates a better system, is the Green or
ecological values base. Obviously I disagree with
a previous poster who claimed that progressive is
not affiliated to a particular political party.
It's not outside the continuum of course but the
Green Party worldwide embodies and promotes
progressivism as Andrew's piece describes. But the
real point is that, rather than anchoring values
to a national grouping or nationalistic system, a
pragmatic progressive values-system needs to "go
to ground," that is, be based on the Earth and its
natural boundaries, limits and possibilities.
Ecologics must replace and/or dominate economics
as the values base for progressives. Just look at
the Green Party platform or their "10 Key Values"
to get a bigger picture of what ecological wisdom
implies for progressivism as a values-base.
Nice piece, Andrew. It's a comfort to know so many
of the next generation are wide awake and moving
forward.
Thank you so much for your thoughtful post. I
really appreciate the time and brains you put into
your comments.
I agree that ecological concerns should be
universal. But I think you misunderstand me when I
say that American progressivism is informed by
uniquely American values. Looking back, I realize
I could have been more clear about this issue.
Here's my clarification:
American progressivism is and should be informed
by American values - whatever they may be.
Americans are a people who have a right to decide
their own moral priorities, just like South
Africans or Indians or an Indonesians will decide
the values that inform their progressivism.
There's direct relevance to public policy here.
That's point one: Progressivism recognizes the
dynamic nature of ethical values and priorities
for different peoples around the world. (NB: This
does not mean moral relativism reigns supreme.
Feel free to contact me later to talk to you about
that.)
The second point is that progressivism is
"uniquely" American because it is driven by both
pragmatism and fairness. That particular
combination of values, I think, is a very American
ideal. That doesn't mean it's solely American.
Doubtless other peoples can and will share in the
desire for practicality and fairness.
Finally, I think that nationalistic concerns are
very important. The preservation and expression of
national cultures, languages and ethical systems
is a good thing - often it is a positive that
states coincide with nations. That doesn't mean
that wars based on nationalism are a good thing,
or that multiculturalism is a bad thing. The
issues are far more complicated to simply label
nationalism as a universal ill.
Thanks again for your insightful thoughts. You can
reach me at asg29@cornell.edu if you'd like to
discuss this further.
By College grad out in the real world
Jul 24th 2007
at 4:38 pm EDT
Beware of the politics you learn in academia. Too many profs wish to brainwash young students to see their way of thinking.
"Progressive" is code for a nuanced socialistic way of politics and making societal change. I strongly suggest you question what you're hearing, and keep an open mind.
Socialism doesn't work. We've seen it over and over again throughout the world. Capitalism indeed has it's flaws, and it's up to us to fix it--not abandon it.
Both political parties have let us down. Hold them accountable.
By Justin Green
Sep 1st 2008
at 1:05 pm EDT
(Updated
Sep 1st 2008 at 1:05 pm EDT)
Congratz on the good eye man, I kind of felt a similar vibe coming from this talk, like everything will be great will be heaven, progressivism really is a buzz word if you think about it, I can almost hear the overlord coming into office after calling these people blathering fools, the reason socialism is on the rise I believe is because of our continuing investments into military affairs and people don't know where to turn to get what they want so anybody who says I will vote for unconditionally pulling the troops out has a shot in office these days.
Russia is a very sensitive subject also we had better watch these numb skulls like George Bush and make sure he doesn't throw us under the bus in Russia, he is really a scumbag and that he hasn't at least been impeached for his mismanagement is the eighth wonder of the world.
One big and (healthy) fear I have for america is that
one day we will see socialist calling people terrorist in order to rignite some kind of political witchhunts, I think things are getting set up pretty well this way and I think that sexuality might get drawn into thing, these insecurity issues have not stopped growing stronger, we need to secure the individual before we secure our nation, socialism sees and end to that. Also whats next immigration holocaust in a country founded on immigration that became socialist please people wake the fuck up!
As the speakers so far have emphasized, our generation is finally combining all the progessive issues into one movement. Even now I feel like I'm a part of something bigger and greater that I had realized.
When I transfer to Orlando and a larger campus, I hope to be even more active than I have been thusfar.
-Joey Malefatto
Jerilyn Libby, Wellesly College
In the contemporary scene, The progressive movement is associated with such economic justice reforms as ending the domination of public policy and the entire political process by corporations and the wealthy class in America, labor rights to collectively bargain and provision of a living wage, tax policy reform which fairly distributes the tax burden between individual citizens and corporations, and fair distribution of government services and expenditures to the human needs of ordinary citizens first and commercial organizations as a second priority if choices are to be made. And domestic needs of citizens first above all other priorities which are set by legislative and executive public policy priorities. Solutions sought are most often systemic change or reform.
Populism- A parallel political movement in America which emphasizes the needs of working, low and moderate income people. In early American history this movement had its origins in rural America. In Texas, the populist movement addressed the rights of ranchers and land owners in west Texas vs. the aggressive “takings” of land in development of railroads, supported by government. In east Texas the populist movement had its roots in usury in bank lending practices with small farmers and landowners. In both cases both corporations and supporting government administrations were the object of criticism and citizen revolt. In the contemporary situation, Texas political office-holders such as Rep. Wright Patman, Sen. Ralph Yarbrough, Agriculture Commissioner Jim Hightower and Attorney General Jim Mattox self identified as Populists, as does candidate David Van Os.
Liberalism- In contrast to progressivism, liberalism, in the domestic application emphasizes social justice issues, often without addressing the core economic injustice underpinnings of worker, racial, gender and sexual discrimination. Solutions sought in the liberal paradigm more often are exemplified in legislation or legal remedies to restore or improve rights and equal access. In contract, progressivism typically seeks systemic change or reform, again with first emphasis on economic justice.
Aaron Hall, Amherst College
Alternatively, you could say that progressives believe in progress (i.e. change) and oppose anything that makes society rigid--that is, not changing (smash the power!).
Andrew Fong, Harvard University
Geoff Aung, Columbia U.
Nathaniel Loewentheil, Yale
panel discussion: we need "progressive
patriotism."
As you noted Andrew, progressives have for too
long been repeatedly and unfairly bereaved of
the
notion of loving our country.
The term and the exemplification of
"progressive
patriotism" bridges this gap between what we
know progressive values to be true to and with
today's political realities. Above all, our values
seek
to build a stronger society through stronger
communities, pragmatic solutions, and a vision
of hope and enduring freedom. Indeed, it is
nation-building in the term's utmost sense.
An ending quote from Wittgenstein: that a
thread's
strength "does not reside in the fact that some
one fibre runs through its whole length, but in
the overlapping of many fibers."
Wayne Huang, Cornell University
willing to make big changes. in that way it's
a
kind of radicalism -- and although it's always
tiresome to go through this explanation,
"radical"
comes from the latin "rad" which means "to get
at
the root of." liberalism is content with the
status quo, allowing small social programs to
serve as band-aids for larger social malaise.
for instance: social security and related
programs
were the some of the first true "progressive"
policies enacted on the federal level. up to
that
point liberals had been content with
faith-based
charity, almshouses, orphanages, soup
kitchens,
etc. but the progressives in the 1930s, drawing
on
the socialist and communist movements in that
and
earlier decades, decided that people in a
community had a responsibility to support each
other over and above what the wealthiest
members'
philanthropy could support.
similarly, the fight for the eight-hour
workday,
the weekend and the right to collective
bargaining
that was undertaken by labor unions,
socialists
and anarchists at the end of the nineteenth
century pressured state and eventually the
federal
government to enact progressive law codifying
these rights.
what we are searching for, however, is a new
kind
of progressivism. we shouldn't be flip about
the
shortcomings of progressivism in the twentieth
century. woodrow wilson had a vision in the
league
of nations, but he was also an avowed racist.
teddy roosevelt broke up the big combines and
monopolies, but he also led an imperialist war
that had lasting effects for nearly a century.
these aren't just character flaws, either.
this
understanding of the world as something that
needed to be "saved," "civilized," "pacified,"
etc. was a defining element of progressivism,
from
william jennings bryan on up to john f.
kennedy.
what we're searching for -- or at least, what
i
hope we're searching for -- is a kind of
progressivism that seeks to empower people
rather
than simply doling out charity. (it's important
to
note that the progenitors of corporate welfare
and
social darwinism can be traced directly to the
current "centrist" beliefs in faith-based
philanthropy and self-regulating business.)
at times, of course, it will be necessary to
enact
laws and protect rights: preserving
environmental
laws, shoring up affirmative action, opposing
the
same-sex marriage ban, finally passing an
equal
rights amendment including the right to an
abortion, etc.
most of what we should be spending our time
focusing on, however, is creating programs and
--
more importantly -- communities that
seek
to empower those who are systematically
disempowered in our society. we need to
endorse,
for instance:
- volunteer health clinics
- community arts programs
- sustainable farms and agriculture
- job-training programs
- after-school tutoring
- women's self-defense classes
- reliable sex education
- conflict resolution/alternative to violence
programs (avp)
- workers' collectives
- community-based community development
projects
i come from the rocky mountain west, where
libertarianism is a strong force. today it
mostly
shows up manifested in republican-party
affiliation, but it wasn't always that way.
progressivism was born in the west -- wyoming
was
the first place in the united states to allow
women to vote, in 1869. the example of
"bleeding
kansas" you already know. and the western-state
system of easily-established citizen
initiatives,
referendums and resolutions -- the kind that
got
gray davis kicked out of office -- were
traditionally used for progressive ends, such
as
medical marijuana and euthanasia statutes in
oregon.
there are times when government, insofar as it
is
our current community of people, needs to be
able
to protect basic rights through law and basic
life
through funding. but by and large people are
willing to take care of each other, if given
the
chance. programs like the ones i outlined
above
have been started all over the united states
(not
to mention the world) to great success. if
progressives began collectively working toward
developing these sorts of things -- with or
without federal funding -- i think that we
could
increase the quality of life, especially in
disempowered communities, quite regardless of
whether the state is "red" or "blue."
that's where i'd like to see progressivism head.
The only area where I would differ is near the ending of his piece where he ties Progressive values to being "American." Without knowing the Andrew's age and being of an "older" generation myself (Gen-X here: born between '63-'71), it's very problematic and potentially dangerous to tie human values as distinctly "American." An Asian, African or European progressive would assuredly agree that progessive values are not uniquely "American." The era of "nation-state"-as-"value-anchor" is long outdated and is substantially the proximate cause of considerable violence in the world today. Progress means tossing that impractical system and opting for a better one.
For me the values base that is most progressive, and illuminates a better system, is the Green or ecological values base. Obviously I disagree with a previous poster who claimed that progressive is not affiliated to a particular political party. It's not outside the continuum of course but the Green Party worldwide embodies and promotes progressivism as Andrew's piece describes. But the real point is that, rather than anchoring values to a national grouping or nationalistic system, a pragmatic progressive values-system needs to "go to ground," that is, be based on the Earth and its natural boundaries, limits and possibilities. Ecologics must replace and/or dominate economics as the values base for progressives. Just look at the Green Party platform or their "10 Key Values" to get a bigger picture of what ecological wisdom implies for progressivism as a values-base.
Nice piece, Andrew. It's a comfort to know so many of the next generation are wide awake and moving forward.
I agree that ecological concerns should be universal. But I think you misunderstand me when I say that American progressivism is informed by uniquely American values. Looking back, I realize I could have been more clear about this issue. Here's my clarification:
American progressivism is and should be informed by American values - whatever they may be. Americans are a people who have a right to decide their own moral priorities, just like South Africans or Indians or an Indonesians will decide the values that inform their progressivism. There's direct relevance to public policy here. That's point one: Progressivism recognizes the dynamic nature of ethical values and priorities for different peoples around the world. (NB: This does not mean moral relativism reigns supreme. Feel free to contact me later to talk to you about that.)
The second point is that progressivism is "uniquely" American because it is driven by both pragmatism and fairness. That particular combination of values, I think, is a very American ideal. That doesn't mean it's solely American. Doubtless other peoples can and will share in the desire for practicality and fairness.
Finally, I think that nationalistic concerns are very important. The preservation and expression of national cultures, languages and ethical systems is a good thing - often it is a positive that states coincide with nations. That doesn't mean that wars based on nationalism are a good thing, or that multiculturalism is a bad thing. The issues are far more complicated to simply label nationalism as a universal ill.
Thanks again for your insightful thoughts. You can reach me at asg29@cornell.edu if you'd like to discuss this further.
Ps.: I'm Generation ... Z? AA? I'm 21 :)
"Progressive" is code for a nuanced socialistic way of politics and making societal change. I strongly suggest you question what you're hearing, and keep an open mind.
Socialism doesn't work. We've seen it over and over again throughout the world. Capitalism indeed has it's flaws, and it's up to us to fix it--not abandon it.
Both political parties have let us down. Hold them accountable.
Russia is a very sensitive subject also we had better watch these numb skulls like George Bush and make sure he doesn't throw us under the bus in Russia, he is really a scumbag and that he hasn't at least been impeached for his mismanagement is the eighth wonder of the world.
One big and (healthy) fear I have for america is that
one day we will see socialist calling people terrorist in order to rignite some kind of political witchhunts, I think things are getting set up pretty well this way and I think that sexuality might get drawn into thing, these insecurity issues have not stopped growing stronger, we need to secure the individual before we secure our nation, socialism sees and end to that. Also whats next immigration holocaust in a country founded on immigration that became socialist please people wake the fuck up!
Link chobits hentai
Link conan hentai
Link spiderman hentai
Link lovely hentai
Link yu gi oh tea hentai
Link dating hentai dating sim game
Link explicit hentai
Link explicit hentai
Link nympho hentai
Link hentai multiple orgasms
Link free hentai mpeg
Link free hentai mpeg
Link innocent hentai
Link free hentai game download
Link hentai index
Link simsons hentai
Link hentai groups.msn
Link hentai groups.msn
Link hentai groups.msn
Link tinker bell hentai
Link hentai animated gifs
Link bambi hentai
Link bambi hentai
Link soy protein weight loss formula
Link nacio herb brown
Link bean soup vegetable
Link dish fta key
Link ham and pinto bean soup
Link best eye candy
Link italian bean soup
Link company for the herbs and spice
Link indian rice pudding recipe
Link bar bar club il joliet night
Link cake chocolate easy recipe
Link pender veterinary clinic
Link bar bar club ma night springfield
Link switching baby from formula to milk
Link obriens irish sandwich bar
Link rootless tree damien rice
Link cuisine filipino from island recipe
Link baby beanie ty values
Link baby boy name 2005
Link baby big halloween
Link baby at eight month
Link baby at eight month
Link baby bauer car eddie seat
Link baby bridal cap jackie shower wedding