The New York Times reports this week that the New York City Council, which gained attention earlier this year when it symbolically banned the use of the “n-word,” has now turned its focus to the slur “bitch.”

The legislation cites lyrics of rappers as well as an excerpt from an 1811 dictionary that defines the word as “A she dog, or doggess; the most offensive appellation that can be given to an English woman.”

I am not arguing that the term bitch is not used in a derogatory form towards women—in many instances it is. But this legislation concerns me, even though at this point in time it would be unenforceable.

First, I do not believe that censorship is the answer to the deeper problem of discrimination of women. In fact, a ban on the word might just increase its power.

Second, the word isn’t always employed in a derogatory sense. It can be argued that some women have reclaimed the word—it is even the name of a really good publication.

In addition, some other words used against women signify that the problem is much bigger than simply one word. For instance, I find the word c**t highly offensive. Its use gives evidence to the continued subjugation of women. This word might be more accurately described by the 1811 definition that the Council cites. But I don't think that outlawing its use would eliminate prejudice.  

The law identifies that sexism is a problem, yet fails to address it in an effective way. I believe Feministing.com sums it up well:

“The idea of fighting sexism by regulating our language seems to me like putting a politically correct band-aid over the larger problem we face--mistreatment and disrespect of women.”