Post from Reading List:
Living Wage at Vanderbilt
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
The New York Times has a great story today about the living wage campaign at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee, which Campus Progress supports through our action grant program. The chancellor there, Gordon Gee, is the third highest-paid university president in the nation, yet workers such as gardeners and housekeepers make under $8 an hour, far less than the national average for their positions. A living wage in the region would be about $10 per hour. One housekeeper tells the Times she and her daughters are living in a homeless shelter. And to rub salt in the wound, Gee recently chose to renovate his chancellor's mansion to the tune of $6 million.

The University's response is beyond shameful. Spokesman Michael J. Schoenfeld tells the Times, "Any large, complex university, any large institution, any large company, is going to have to make an almost infinite number of decisions about how to expend resources and what is consistent with the mission." Riiiight. Just like Wal-Mart, the second-most profitable company in the nation with over $11 billion in profits, can't afford to offer health insurance, pay workers overtime, or purchase workers' uniforms for them.

Reader Comments
  
Raise the minimum wage
By NYPopulist Dec 1st 2006 at 11:39 am EST
It's time people and companies started treating their employees like human beings. You can't feed and shelter a family for $8 and hour, nevermind $5.15/hr. A mother earning the minimum wage is, under our own guidelines, living in poverty - absolutely shameful.
  
Part of the Trend
By Joseph Peha Dec 1st 2006 at 5:59 pm EST
The outrageous economic discrepancy between university presidents and university employees is an extension of acceptable levels of income disparity in our society. For example, the average CEO salary was 262 times greater than the average worker in 2005. That number used be 35 in the late 1970's. Appalling. Even universitys can't escape this trend, as much as David Horowitz would probably like to refute.
  
This is a damn shame.
By Superduperficial Dec 1st 2006 at 11:41 pm EST
There is no logically justifiable argument for a Living Wage from either a conservative, liberal, or progressive perspective. It is not an intelligent means of helping the poor.

I did my best to make the strong liberal case against the 'living wage' when it came to Georgetown, running a campaign at Link.

Did I win? On paper, not necessarily - Georgetown appeared to give in. But then they've been stonewalling the Solidarity Committee on actual implementation, so there you go.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress