Post from Reading List:
Women as Commodities
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

It's capitalism run amok. Via a moving New York Times story, in South Korea, the government has decided that the 2,000 to 3,000 marriage agencies that trade in foreign-born wives for South Korean men are so abusive toward women that they must be regulated by the Department of Health and Welfare. As is so often the case, as ambitious women in more developed countries make progress, ambitious women in less developed countries struggle to catch up by trading on traditional femininity: whether as contract wives to foreign men, sex workers catering to wealthy tourists, or childcare providers for working women abroad:

“Nowadays, Korean women have higher standards,” said Lee Eun-tae, the owner of Interwedding, an agency that last year matched 400 Korean bachelors with brides from Vietnam, China, the Philippines, Mongolia, Thailand, Cambodia, Uzbekistan and Indonesia. “If a man has only a high school degree, or lives with his mother, or works only at a small- or medium-size company, or is short or older, or lives in the countryside, he’ll find it very difficult to marry in Korea.”

Critics say the business demeans and takes advantage of poor women. But brokers say they are merely matching the needs of Korean men and foreign women seeking better lives.

If you're interested in these issues, I highly recommend a book I just finished, Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. This collection attacks head-on the issue of the unequal distribution of feminism, and the ways in which men's unwillingness to take on traditionally "feminine" tasks, such as childcare and domestic labor, create a global migration of women workers relegated to the lowest status jobs in our societies.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Question:
By Superduperficial Feb 22nd 2007 at 6:57 pm EST
How many labor markets are we willing to shut down entirely, rather than regulate, because there's a potential for abuse?

Workers can and have been abused working in big-box stores like Wal-Mart, but nobody is talking about shutting down the retail sector.

As for the idea of whether a woman should be allowed to sell sex/companionship or not -- any line you're going to draw can be shown very quickly to be arbitrary, and based more on our cultural conditioning than on pure logic.

If a woman is willing to trade her companionship, whether emotional, sexual, or both, for money - I don't have a problem with that.

If she's getting abused, I have a huge problem with that. But just as with other forms of abuse, the best answer is strong, smart government regulation, not a shutdown that simply forces the issue underground.

It sounds like South Korea is working on that.


Look at the demographics in Asia. Look at the 500,000 surplus men that are coming of age in China right now (Ironically, only 25% of that is due to sex-selective abortion; 75% is due to inadequate Hepatitis B prevention, which makes a mother more likely to bear male children).

Those 500,000 men are going to want wives. And if they can't find them, they'll be pissed.

The transnational bridal trade is going to grow no matter what you or I think about it, due to overwhelming demand.

Hold your nose if you must, but the best results will come from regulations and assistance to make sure women aren't trapped with an abusive husband.
Re: Question:
By niralshah Feb 23rd 2007 at 10:40 am EST
Ah, yes. The market and those pesky inefficient regulations. I think libertarian talking points are actually based on a mad-lib sort of formula, where you just get to fill in the relevant details.

Regulations to better monitor spousal abuse are kind of useful, it's also a bit like trying to put a massive fire out by spitting at it. Problems like that are far more deeply rooted in culture, and condoning (especially by subsidizing) the foreign bride thing is not only a symptom of the problem, but also a likely factor in exacerbating inequality.

For nations that are only more recently developing and liberalizing, maybe conceptions of equality that involve fair division of domestic labor might still be a bit further down the road. But, if marrying women who have a language and educational barrier to independence becomes an acceptable phenomenon, it both reinforces antiquated and injust gender stereotypes and creates an atmosphere primed for emotional, if not physical, abuse.
  
Important Post
By athompson Feb 23rd 2007 at 5:18 am EST
Insightful post. The exploitation of women going on in the global south today is ridiculous and a lot of people are making tons of money from it. Many of these women are forced into labor, sex, marriage, and child bearing. It's a horrible externality of the global economy. I agree with the other commenter that it is going to take more government regulation and accountability towards protecting their citizens. Poor women are often times vulnerable and their vulnerabilities are taken advantage of by enterprising men and other women looking to profit from it.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress