Post from Reading List:
A Woman's Ambition
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
I've been intrigued by the flurry of articles about Nancy Pelosi that have appeared over the last several weeks, and particularly by the way they deal with her gender. In the New York Times this morning, Pelosi swears to a reporter that she never aspired to be speaker of the house:
Her campaign aides play down her ambition, denying that she ever planned to lead anything -- an assertion Ms. Pelosi repeated in the interview.

But current and former associates describe her as infused with political aspirations almost from birth.

"She has always wanted to be speaker," said Tony Coelho, a former House Democratic whip. "She told me so 10 or 15 years ago."


Compare Pelosi, who grew up around politics and has served in Congress for nearly two decades, to Barack Obama, a senator at the beginning of his first term who unabashedly floats his presidential intentions. Why does Pelosi feel the need to deny her own ambition? Perhaps because we're still so uncomfortable with feminine power that we need to believe the women who wield it are just, well, accidents.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
I don't think that's it...
By jr Oct 30th 2006 at 2:17 pm EST
Look at their relative favorability ratings. I'm guessing that Obama kicks the crap out of Pelosi head-to-head across just about every demographic line. What they'd be looking for right now would be to limit the amount of publicity Pelosi (who would be the biggest single beneficiary of a Democratic takeover of the House) receives, as she's a more attractive target for Republican attacks. If Obama were in line to become Senate Majority Leader, he'd probably still be talking Presidential ambitions, but because he's wildly popular, not because he's male.

And, as you note, Obama's new on the scene, which means he doesn't have a lengthy record to sift through to find ammunition. Pelosi, on the other hand, has plenty that can rile up Republican base voters. They're trying to limit her public persona prior to the election. I imagine if she becomes Speaker she'll be much less demure.
  
I think...
By Ben Adler Oct 30th 2006 at 2:59 pm EST
you're both right. Clearly there is still a certain level of discomfort with ambitious women--hence the strength of anti-Hillary Clinton sentiment. On the other hand, I think JR is right that the Barack Obama comparison is neither here nor there. Obama gets away (thus far) with his meteoric rise because of his popularity. After all, who was the last first term senator to be widely touted as a potential presidential candidate? That would be Hillary Clinton--a woman
Re: I think...
By Dana Goldstein Oct 30th 2006 at 4:43 pm EST
ha. touché on that last point, ben...
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress