Pentagon Seals Soldiers Off From Family Photos
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
NYT's The Lede blog reports:

The Defense Department has decided to make it impossible to reach 13 Web sites from its network, citing an overabundance of “recreational traffic.”

In the policy released today, General B.B. Bell, commander in South Korea, said use of those sites “impacts our official DoD network and bandwidth ability, while posing a significant operational security challenge.”

Among the restricted sites is Photobucket. I don't know about you, but all I ever see there are pictures of family gatherings and new babies. MySpace and YouTube are also banned, along with several other video sites. If they're really short on bandwidth, I can understand cutting YouTube, but c'mon folks. Let's not send our armed forces into conflict and cut them off from a common way of staying in touch with families and friends.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Agreed.
By Superduperficial May 14th 2007 at 6:41 pm EDT
On the one hand, there are a million other ways to swap photos with families back home. Your headline is rather sensationalist and disingenuous.

That said, we're supposed to be reconstructing an entire country, and we can't even handle getting enough bandwidth to the soldiers that YouTube isn't a problem?


My guess?

There's something else at work here. YouTube videos are actually very low-quality, not really bandwidth hogs. MySpace and Photobucket, similarly, are likely not placing much of a strain on the DoD's bandwidth.

Sounds more like they don't want the troops spending so much time on the internet.
Re: Agreed.
By Graham May 14th 2007 at 9:21 pm EDT
yeah it was sensationalist. had to get your attention somehow. the interpretation on the lede (comments) is that they might not want service members telling unflattering stories to folks back home. but damn, i just can't believe they're cutting off people's emotional lifelines for any reason.

'cause say you're going off to some base that doesn't have as much internet access, and your wife sends you a photobucket of your brother's new baby. but you can't wait to ask them to put it somewhere else. ugh.
Re: Agreed.
By Superduperficial May 15th 2007 at 2:05 am EDT
""the interpretation on the lede (comments) is that they might not want service members telling unflattering stories to folks back home.""

That explanation doesn't fit with the fact pattern here. If they don't want the service members telling unflattering stories to the folks back home, how will blocking MySpace do anything if they're not blocking e-mail?

I used to be a member of a message board where soldiers in Iraq would post pictures they'd taken of anything and everything, some of which were unimaginably gory. This new regulation wouldn't stop them from doing that, or attaching those pictures to an e-mail.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress