| By JonathanGarro - Jan 31st, 2007 at 4:27 pm EST |
So to review: The best that the GOP, (a party which lost power due in large part to corruption), can do when it needs to fill a position on a committee which itself deals with corruption, is to appoint someone who is himself under investigation by the FBI for corruption. Why was the post open? Because the last person to hold it, John Doolittle (R-CA), had close ties to Jack Abramoff.
According to The Hill's article:
Brian Kennedy, a spokesman for Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), said the leadership team would act "decisively" if a member were found to have violated the law or House rules.
Why was decisively in quotations? Probably because that was the same word that Dennis Hastert's spokesman used when he referred to how they would handle the Foley scandal.
Wait. They didn't handle the situation.
Regarding the charges against Rep. Miller:
...Melanie Sloan of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) said Republicans are in the minority because they have operated under just that kind of policy for the past several years. The group filed a complaint about Miller's land deals with the IRS last August. "Until you can understand that your members have to do better than just avoid indictment, then you're going to stay in the minority for many years to come," Sloan said. "We're gratified that there is an investigation. Miller has been clearly engaged in illegal activity and hopefully this will put an end to it."
Jonathan is the editor of SkipperStyle, a political blog.

Comments are closed for this post.