Was Slate’s Cover Sexist?
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

Earlier this week we had some interesting discussion about sexism and gender double standards in relation to Katha Pollitt’s new book. As with her reaction to the Times review of Pollitt’s book, Jessica at Feministing has again called “sexist bullshit,”  this time in relation to the image accompanying Slate’s Sex Issue. She writes:

Okay, I'm all for sex issues. I'd just appreciate it if a leading online news magazine didn't equate sex with a headless porned out asscracked woman.
 

It’s true, to equate sex with “a headless porned out asscracked woman” would be a dismal and probably sexist editorial decision. Problem is, that’s patently not what Slate is doing. Was the image chosen in questionable taste? Well, I’d say quite poor taste. Cartoonishly pornographic? Yes. But the image is also quite obviously an illustration, defined as “visual matter used to clarify or decorate a text.” In fact, in this case it illustrated an article about the history of the female butt. Here’s another cover image of a sex issue, from movieline magazine: Is the magazine somehow equating a spread-legged Kevin Spacey with sex? Or, more to the point, did the cover image of Jessica’s own book, Full Frontal Feminism, equate feminism with a young woman’s taut, sexed out navel? I don’t think so. These are all illustrations. And, just to be clear, I’m a fan of Feministing. I just think this type of knee-jerk post devalues the force of the “sexist” label.

Reader Comments
  
Agreed.
By Superduperficial Sep 29th 2007 at 1:45 pm EDT
Jessica Valenti is worth reading once in a while, but when it comes to deciding what is and isn't sexist, she can be myopic as hell.
  
typically masculinist reaction
By lucky Oct 5th 2007 at 3:28 am EDT
One pull quote does not a fair analysis make, Justin. You make a fair argument about the cover feature, if you think a fully-clothed Kevin Spacey is equally sexed-out as a half-naked woman with her crack exposed.

And in any case, I'm pretty sure Jessica called racist, sexist bullshit on the entire feature... because it is racist, sexist bullshit. Maybe you left out the racist part because you're afraid to challenge someone on a race issue. Maybe you're worried it'd be racist to argue against the issue when it's race, but not sexist when the issue is sex? I'm not going to repeat Jessica's points, because she sets them out pretty clearly herself in the article. But next time, try reading the article before having that knee-jerk "threatened-when-someone-says- sexist" reaction again.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress