Times Needs Better Fact-Checkers
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

First, Bill Kristol cites Michelle Malkin when he meant Michael Medved. Now we get this embarrassing (and still uncorrected, as of this writing) error from the latest David Brooks column:

All the habits of verbal thuggery that have long been used against critics of affirmative action, like Ward Churchill and Thomas Sowell, and critics of the radical feminism, like Christina Hoff Summers, are now being turned inward by the Democratic front-runners.

Ward Churchill? The Native-American Marxist "chickens-coming-home-to-roost" dude? I'm pretty sure he means Ward Connerly. Lesson for the fact-checkers here: you gotta check the name beyond the initials.

p.s. an alternative explanation: Could this be some kind of subversive act of neocon solidarity from Brooks?


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
also
By Annika Jan 15th 2008 at 9:33 am EST
"critics of the radical feminism"?

THE radical feminism? weird.
  
oh, fact-checking
By casey Jan 15th 2008 at 12:12 pm EST
You're in for life, my friend.
Re: oh, fact-checking
By Justin Elliott Jan 15th 2008 at 1:46 pm EST
Let the record show that the Times has now taken the low road--that is, correcting the error without appending a correction or even acknowledging an error.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress