No Surprises Here
|
|
| Also listed in: Campus Progress Blog |
The New York Times ran a piece yesterday on a report that wealthy people outlive poor ones.
This news isn't particularly shocking; just one more statistic to prove the gap between the haves and have-nots in our country. This does prove one thing: Our government should be more concerned with how to provide quality, affordable healthcare to the economically disadvantaged.
In 1980-82, Dr. Singh said, people in the most affluent group could expect to live 2.8 years longer than people in the most deprived group (75.8 versus 73 years). By 1998-2000, the difference in life expectancy had increased to 4.5 years (79.2 versus 74.7 years), and it continues to grow, he said.
After 20 years, the lowest socioeconomic group lagged further behind the most affluent, Dr. Singh said, noting that “life expectancy was higher for the most affluent in 1980 than for the most deprived group in 2000.”
“If you look at the extremes in 2000,” Dr. Singh said, “men in the most deprived counties had 10 years’ shorter life expectancy than women in the most affluent counties (71.5 years versus 81.3 years).” The difference between poor black men and affluent white women was more than 14 years (66.9 years vs. 81.1 years).
This news isn't particularly shocking; just one more statistic to prove the gap between the haves and have-nots in our country. This does prove one thing: Our government should be more concerned with how to provide quality, affordable healthcare to the economically disadvantaged.
Public policy that is anti-growth is counterproductive in this light.