| By KevinCollins - Mar 10th, 2005 at 12:15 am EST |
| Also listed in: Campus Progress Blog |
I like the term "progressive" for another reason; it more accurately describes the movement. Classical liberalism -- or for that matter the difference between libertarianism and communitarianism -- have little to do with the political divisions in America today. George Lakoff has offered an alternate, more explanatory division between "strict father" and "nurturant parent" models of political values. However, nurturant parents does not offer a particularly compelling label. Instead, I think progressive best defines the current movement. We see government as a way to positively improve people's lives, but at the same time not hinder their basic rights. The opposite of progressive actually is conservative as we know now the term (or perhaps regressive, but I suppose that's hoping for two much).
For me, to be progressive is to support a true American community in the fullest sense of the word. We are a commonwealth, we are neighbors, and we have responsibilities to one another that are in part exercised through a responsive, responsible government. As a community, we must that defend the public trust, protect the vulnerable, preserve the righs of our individual members, and expand prosperity for all. Such a view seems to me to be not purely liberal and certainly not conservative. Hence, I choose "progressive."
What about you?

Comments are closed for this post.
century economic theory, where it was meant to
denote a rigid adherence to laissez-faire,
no-government-involvement
-at-all economics. If you were a true "liberal"
you wouldn't support welfare, social security,
corporate regulation (to avoid Enrons), and other
great ideas that this movement has embraced. So
that's why I prefer the term "progressive" instead
of "liberal." I feel "liberal" is just not a very
historically accurate term when it is used to
describe what we believe in.