Post from Matt Zeitlin's Blog:
William F. Buckley Jr as a Progressive Role Model
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

William F. Buckley Jr, who died today, was mostly known for founding and editing National Review and being a leading conservative intellectual, journalist and thinker for more 5 decades.  But before founding National Review, he wrote God and Man at Yale. He was in many ways the original conservative critic of the academy.  God and Man was a polemic against the liberal atheism, or at least agnoisticism, among Yale faculty.  Buckley anticipated those right wing critics who today think that college campuses are much too liberal, except he was doing it 50 years ago.

 But more importantly, Buckley should be a model to all of us young writers looking to influence the political scene.  Buckley wrote God and Man when he was 25, and founded the most influential political magazine of the last half-century when he was 29.  And even though he was a conservatives’ conservative, he still appreciated youthful vigor and energy in his movement that he did some much to shape.  He was an enthusiastic Goldwater supporter and helped found Young Americans for Freedom in 1960 so as to channel youthful energy into movement conservatism.  In modern liberal blog terms, he was some freaky combination of Matt Yglesias, Markos Moulistas and Rick Perlstein – except conservative.

There's a whole lot anyone can learn from Buckley the man - he was kind, urbane, sensitive, intelligent and an amazing stylist.  But we liberals and progressives rightly are repulsed by his politics.  But there's also Buckley the institution builder.  And he was greatly responsible for turning conservatism into the institutional force it is.  And he was able to do it by providing ideological coherence and also by energizing and deploying young people to be proud, excited conservatives.  But he also viewed conservatism as distinct from the Republican party and was ready to abandon the party when he thought it wasn't conservative enough.  He should be the model for what we self-styled progressives are doing today -  building a set of institutions to make progressivism a lasting force in American politics.  And while many of us are supporters of the Democratic party, we recognize that our movement has to be more than a partisan one.  In short, we need to be like Buckley to reverse the gains him and his movement have chalked up in the last 50 years. 


Reader Comments
  
agreed.
By Annika Feb 28th 2008 at 11:17 am EST
There's been a lot of vitriol written over the years about Buckley's success--but for me, the bottom line is that progressives should learn from his immense success. We shouldn't discount his methods simply because he developed them for the other team.
Re: agreed.
By Annika Feb 28th 2008 at 2:34 pm EST
wait, he was a "stylist"?
  
money
By anon Feb 28th 2008 at 12:29 pm EST
But he also came from a very wealthy family. "He" -- read, "his father" -- paid for the advertising campaign for God and Man and his father gave him six figures to found NR. Hardly a model that any old progressive can follow.
  
Thanks but no thanks
By Tyler Cruse Feb 28th 2008 at 2:09 pm EST
Poor Bill, he must be turning over in his grave if he's reading any of this tepid progressive praise. It must be like double death.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
By Matt Zeitlin Feb 28th 2008 at 2:13 pm EST
This would be the same Bill Buckley who was a lifelong friend of James Galbraith. The one thing that comes out in all the obits and remembrances is that he valued friendship, cordiality, politeness and kindness. I think he'd likely see all this liberal praise of his personal virtues as perfectly appropriate, if not a bit over stated.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
By Tyler Cruse Feb 28th 2008 at 2:45 pm EST
"The one thing that comes out in all the obits and remembrances is that he valued friendship, cordiality, politeness and kindness"

He certainly did value these things. Too bad it wasn't reciprocal from the left. The "respectable" leftist magazine Saturday Review in reviewing his book God and Man at Yale compared him to the KKK The uber-leftist Gore Vidal repeatedly accused him of being a Nazi.
To Buckley's credit, he always kept the dialog at a high intellectual level and never responded in kind to the barrage of hate speech from the left he was forced to endure for most of his life.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
By mark b. Feb 28th 2008 at 6:09 pm EST
Buckley was polite to his adversaries? You must be joking. He told Noam Chomsky he was going to "smash his goddamned face" and called Gore Vidal a queer and threatened him as well. Vidal did call Buckley a crypto-nazi which is not accurate. Buckley was not crypto anything, he was a flaming fascist and defended the worst atrocities of American imperialism, and he did it with the utmost arrogance and contempt for the truth. He was a vile piece of garbage that did not deserve the 82 years he lived on Earth.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
By Tyler Cruse Feb 28th 2008 at 6:52 pm EST
Thanks, Mark, for demonstrating a more genuine view of what the Progressive view of the brilliant William Buckley is and always has been. The disingenuous "damning with faint praise" of the other posts here all had the odor of insincerity about them. Thank you for your honesty.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
By mark b. Feb 29th 2008 at 3:01 am EST
Tyler,
It's not the "Progressive view,' it's the truth. I would like to see one piece of footage that shows Buckley to be polite and intellectually engaging the issues. Every second of his life was spent with trashing the truth and arrogantly trying to squash anybody who spoke the truth, like Noam Chomsky and Gore Vidal. And please don't patronize me with this "I appreciate your honesty" bullshit. PLLEASE keep it real, douchebag.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
By Tyler Cruse Feb 29th 2008 at 2:14 pm EST
Mark,
Well, it's true, Buckley did not suffer pompous intellectual buffoons (such as Chomskey and Gore) lightly. But since it was one of the few short comings of this great genius, I say we move on and let him rest in peace.
Re: Thanks but no thanks
By mark b. Feb 29th 2008 at 3:14 pm EST
Whoaa...Buckley was the buffoon. He was never once able to rebut anything Chomsky or Gore said so he had to resort to threats and insults. He thought that sneering uncontrollably and spewing out big words made him sound intelligent. Conservatives may be fooled by such pomposity, but not progressives. Conservatives are retarded but Buckley was able to make it to recess without crapping in his bloomers, so he is revered as a God by conservatives. Buckley was the John Holmes of mental masturbation. There is not a single intelligent phrase uttered by that fool, and in his latter years he came across as completely deranged.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress