|
|
"I sometimes felt as if I were watching the psychodrama of the baby boom generation -- a tale rooted in old grudges and revenge plots hatched on a handful of college campuses long ago -- played out on the national stage."While he is obviously trying to find a way to turn his his limited experience and relatively young age into a positive message of change that could inspire many, espcially young voters, could he be stepping a bit too far with the message in this case (assuming he contintues to point that out as a distinction). As the article states,
Mr. Obama would be foolish to run solely as the anti-boomer, [...], if for no other reason than that the baby boomers are the largest generation in American history, and they vote.

Some mild disassociation from Barack isn't going to turn them against him. This will not hurt him nor be an issue with the electorate.
However, I think this becomes relevant in the long run for a couple of reasons.
The Diehard Republicans are becoming increasingly smaller and smaller as the years go on. Our particular generation--although generally apathetic and dis-connected from the political process—tends to reflect a much more lenient and liberal perception of the nature of diversity in a democracy (or democracy outlined by diversity).
This means that much of the Baby Boomer crowd--while morphing into somewhat of a "yuppie class" still might play a significant role in re-defining the swing voting block.
Quite simply then, it could very well be something to at least try to avoid in the future.