| By RachelGoodman - Apr 21st, 2005 at 3:20 pm EDT |
| Also listed in: Campus Progress Blog |
Starting today, same-sex couples in Connecticut will enjoy the same rights to make medical decisions for each other, file taxes jointly, and raise their children together that straight couples have long enjoyed. But the outcome isn't the only part of this story that's important. The fact that the policy came out of the political branches and not the judiciary is a crucial part of the story. Already, it's clear that the arguments of opponents seem a lot weaker when positioned against a decision made by the people's representatives. They can't whine about "judicial activism," so they must instead react in a way that's far healthier for our democracy-- by promising to hold politicians accountable for their votes at the next election.
Amidst all the recent controversy about "moral" issues and judicial independence at the federal level, it's great to see the political branches of my state government pre-empting that whole, nasty debate here. I believe that our constitutional tradition of gender equality jurisprudence demands the recognition of marriage between any two consenting adults. But I also understand that judicial decisions aren't made in a vacuum, and that sometimes (remember Roe?) the articulation of a valid constitutional right can do more damage than good for a progressive cause. That's why I hope other states follow Hartford's lead and legislate civil union rights, so that the courts don't have to.
(And yes, I'm back, having handed in my senior essay just an hour ago. It may or may not have been about highly similar issues to those discussed in this post.)

Comments are closed for this post.
the right to raise a child? I think you are only
taking into account adult’s rights. A child
being raise by two men, or women, is unfair. For
one the child will lack a father or mother. Also,
the child’s life in school at a young age
would be horrible. The things other children will
say could lead the child into a world of mental
turmoil. Marriage is enough for now. Wait for
people to be more understanding before you drag
children into this mess.
Ideally, a kid has a mother and a father. So if an unmarried woman gets pregnant, should she be required to put the baby up for adoption?
Kids with Down's Syndrome have a lot of trouble with their peers in school. Should they be required to go to separate schools?
What about black kids in mostly white schools?
Besides, most kids that are up for adoption are in less-than-ideal situations. Having loving, stable, same-sex parents would be better than jumping from foster home to foster home.