Coverage on Coverage
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Health insurance is a perennial issue in elections, but it tends to fall out of public discussion in general. In case you've forgotten the staggering stats, there are more than 45 million uninsured Americans. But, in this week's New Yorker, Atul Gawande presents the economics of health care from the physician's perspective, and reveals something perhaps even more grim: without serious reform, the insurance system as a whole is unsustainable in the long term.

For-profit insurance companies wrangle with the best-paid doctors in the world for revenue, while insurance premiums rise by close to 10% a year. But we can't afford to pay doctors less --they are already earning a lower return on their educational investments than lawyers or businesspeople -- and our piecemeal combination of private and pubic insurance leaves 1 in 7 Americans without coverage.

I dare any laissez faire conservative who reads this site dismissively to propose a solution that doesn't involve expansion of Medicare and Medicaid. Simultaneously, I dare any pro-business coservative to suggest one that doesn't involve removing special privileges for pharmeceutical companies. We all know that the answer, if there is one, involves using the power of the government to more effectively and fairly direct the power of the market. Let's hope we find it soon. Preferably before I graduate, lose my parents' insurance, and find out that my little blogging gig at Campus Progress doesn't come with benefits.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

No comments have been written yet.
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress