| By RachelGoodman - Mar 29th, 2005 at 1:27 pm EST |
| Also listed in: Campus Progress Blog |
So what gives? How can Jackson justify climbing on board the media circus that the right has incited to score points over one family's tragedy? If sixty-seven percent of Americans can see the naked politicking here, it seems difficult to believe that Jackson cannot. Jackson, however, told the crowd "This is a moral issue and it transcends politics and family disputes."
I'm totally perplexed. Thoughts?

Comments are closed for this post.
he no longer has one anymore. Any possibility to
grab the camera spotlight, he does that.
This isn't about morality for him, nor is he the
one to preach about moral values. After all, he
has children out of wed lock.
This is the same man who interviewed Michael
Jackson this weekend, threw him softball
questions, and then offered his prayers to him as
he works through his trial. If Jesse wants to bed
down with this issue, then he beds alone.
Todd
If civil rights leaders and government officials want to talk about "life," lets start with those issues above first before challenging the supremecy of Judicial Review. I suspect we could have a greater impact on those issues.
Todd