Post from Srinivas Rao's Blog:
Academic Freedom Conference: David Horowitz Says Hello From Alternate Universe
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

The Second Annual Academic Freedom Conference came to an unceremonious close with a "debate" between David Horowitz and President of the American Association of University Professors Cary Nelson. And by "debate," I mean "an oppurtunity for Horowitz and his supporters to make ad hominem attacks against the AAUP and liberals."

Horowitz chided Nelson for not partaking in intelligent discourse on at least three occasions, and, each time, preceeded to call the AAUP anti-freedom, supporters of terrorists, or holocaust deniers. And I guess that's what passed for intelligent discourse, since one of the 30 people still in the room after the debate confronted Nelson about AAUP taking "a third of its budget" from terrorist groups. My guess is that the only way this could have been less intelligent is if Horowitz and co. insulted the moderator -- oh wait, that happened. Now Scott Smallwood of the Chronicle of Higher Education knows that he, too, is opposed to academic freedom.

Horowitz had obviously lost his grip on reality, but by his closing statements, he really let loose. He began by complaining that he was only one man and therefore couldn't be expected to actually verify anything he says (even though he has his own magazine, a student organization, and a budget of $14.5 million). He then went on a tangential rant about how corporations are funding....liberals? Some great moments:

"Everyone knows that businesses fund liberals."
So thats why businesses gave over $600 million to Republican candidates in 2004, $200 million more than they gave to Democrats and more than 65% of the republican party's budget. It was an elaborate ruse, some sort of double-cross -- good work, Horowitz!

"Businesses do business, not politics."
Just because the Students for Academic Freedom can't walk and chew gum at the same time, doesn't mean that corporations can't do it. They gave more 60% of all political donations in 2004, totalling more than $1.5 billion and far surpassing any other group.

"95% of all CEO's are liberal."
This is just a dirty, dirty lie. Business associations provide more than 80% of their political donations to Republicans, and CEO's of the automotive, tobacco, food, chemical and waste industries all give substantially more money to Republicans than Democrats. Out of top 20 most pro-Democratic industries, the only groups with CEOs to speak of are the entertainment and media industries.

Now this all would have been insulting if anyone cared. But Cary Nelson, who looks like Santa Claus raised in the 60's, spent the whole debate chuckling, and our undercover blogger contigent already had their brains melted by four hours of wingnuttery. So congratulations, David Horowitz, you successfully preached to the choir and that one guy watching you on C-SPAN. You can put this one in the win column.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
WHOROWITZ
By Southern Progress Mar 6th 2007 at 9:44 am EST
Your title alone provides a clear and concise analysis of Whorowitz. Not to mention the YAF, Heritage Foundation, Fox News.

This guy is unbelievable. Good job.
  
liberal reporting
By uspatriot Mar 6th 2007 at 8:17 pm EST
An ethical journalist accurately reports details and quotes correctly when covering a story.

Since your comments are blatantly untrue, not to mention poorly edited, it appears you do not qualify for the title.

I was there, I heard Professor Nelson attack Horowitz personally, without provocation. He misquoted Horowitz out of context and danced around the most basic questions. Nelson should be applauded for attending the debate, but seemed incapable of conducting critical discussion without ad hominem attacks. Horowitz made no such statements. In fact, he praised Nelson and complimented him.

The one guy who made a stupid comment at the end of the debate does not represent the majority. At least no one threw pies or salad dressing at anyone (liberals have the corner on that game).

Smallwood was never chastised and, if anything, it was Nelson who kept talking to him during the debate.

And by the way, you were hardly undercover. Rats smell.
Re: liberal reporting
By Rao Mar 7th 2007 at 11:04 am EST (Updated Mar 7th 2007 at 11:15 am EST)
I'll admit, I wasn't undercover in any real sense of the word -- it would have been extraordinarily difficult, given that only about 40 people bothered to show up for the conference, virtually all of whom were on a first name basis with David Horowitz.

I'm confused by the rest of your post, though -- Exactly what, pray tell, makes my post "blatantly untrue"? Was it the part where Horowitz made up statistics about corporate political donors, or the part where Horowitz claimed that Smallwood's Chronicle of Higher Education and InsideHigherEd were apart of the "problem"? Maybe it was the part about the three bloggers being mind-numbingly bored -- because, let me tell you, I'm 100% sure of that.

I don't know if Nelson was "incapabale of conducting critical discussion" -- PreparationG and I both agreed that he wasn't extremely persuasive, but we concluded thats not because he's stupid but because he just didn't care (half his opening statement, remember, was him doing a David Horowitz impression). And at least his "ad hominem" attacks -- if thats how we are defining discussion of Horowitz' conservative fundraisers and the factual misrepresentations in his work -- were fact-based. Horowitz, on the other hand, was just saying "terrorist" and "freedom" as many times as possible in hopes of stumbling onto an argument.

I'm also glad to know liberals have cornered the salad market -- seriously, what the hell? I've seen enough protests to understand what conservatives are capable of ( Link and Link and Link ) -- so lets just agree that crazy people are crazy and stop creating strawmen.

Oh wait, without strawmen, how would David Horowitz sell books?
Re: liberal reporting
By uspatriot Mar 23rd 2007 at 12:05 pm EDT
Transcript of the debate: let's see who was throwing insults at whom. Who was telling blatant lies about whom? Hmmmmm....



Link
Re: liberal reporting
By Rao Apr 1st 2007 at 4:54 pm EDT (Updated Apr 1st 2007 at 4:56 pm EDT)
Huh? As the trascript shows, the only person throwing insults or telling blatant lies is David Horowitz. This is not new information -- I covered it in my post. A month ago. Seriously, is this discussion still happening?

If you have a more specific complaint, then make one.
  
$$$
By persiancowboy Mar 7th 2007 at 11:50 am EST
Most of Democrats are also too corrupt that accept money from big business. Republicans might get more money from corporations, but that doesn't mean that Democrats are the good guys.
  
Where are the Democrats?
By Brian Mar 23rd 2007 at 11:09 pm EDT
"So where are all the Democrats? Do they not care about academic freedom?" This had to be my favorite line of the "bipartisan" conference. I'll tell you exactly where they are: Not at CPAC. The only way Horowitz got 40 people to show up was to have this thing on the heels of CPAC. And Horowitz, who claims he wants this to be a bipartisan organization completely alienated the 5 liberals who were there with comments like "You know the difference between liberals and conservatives? Liberals don't work towards important things, while conservatives work toward things like careers and families." I really had higher expectations from this guy.
Re: Where are the Democrats?
By uspatriot Mar 31st 2007 at 2:56 pm EDT
Oh, and Nelson didn't alienate every decent human being by joking that he thought about giving Rick Santorum a hug to give him his cold? Or to make fun of the attendees' clean cut appearances? Gimme a break. Libs alienate themselves by their self-righteous lies of tolerance veiled in burkhas [enter here any sort of disguised politically correct actionable issue]. It is a double-speak that is so ingrained in the liberal mind, they seem truly incapable of seeing that they are intolerant hypocrites.
Re: Where are the Democrats?
By Rao Apr 1st 2007 at 5:09 pm EDT
I don't know if a joke about giving a conservative a cold qualifies as one of those "self-righteous lies of tolerance veiled in burkhas [sic]." It was a joke, dude. For being a member of a movement that popularized Ann Coulter, I think you're overreacting a bit.

As Brian pointed out, there were comments of equal ridiculousness made by conservatives at the Academic Freedom Conference, but they weren't meant to be funny. I'm pretty sure that the claim that "liberals hate freedom" is, at best, a one-liner-gone-wrong to "every decent human being" -- and its the same reason why the Academic Freedom Conference was a joke.
  
A YEAR AFTER HOROWITZ SPOKE AT MY SCHOOL
By Michael Meeropol Apr 7th 2007 at 8:17 am EDT
I know Horowitz is still at it ... I caught some of his recent garbage on C-SPAN.

Last March (2006) he came to speak at my college's Law School. I did some research an published the following article. Some folks might want to check it out:

Link

You can also reach it by going to GOOGLE and entering David Horowitz is a Fraud (even without quotes, the article is number two).

I continue to believe it's very important to expose as many of Horowitz's lies as possible.

Mike Meeropol
Economics Department
Western New England College
Springfield, MASS
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress