| By Eugene Resnick - Jun 24th, 2007 at 8:07 pm EDT |
Elizabeth Edwards, cancer-stricken wife of former Senator and Democratic Presidential contender John Edwards, came out in support of gay marriage today at a press conference at the San Francisco Pride Parade. She said explicitly, "I don't know why someone else's marriage has anything to do with me. I'm completely comfortable with gay marriage."
My fellow progressives, this is historic news. Her comments and her willingness to be open about her views despite knowing that they don't parallel those of her civil union-supporting husband indicate the growing political capital of the LGBT community. Never has a viable top tier presidential candidate come out in support of gay marriage and I admit that I wish John Edwards would have the courage to do the same. However, Elizabeth is as close to her husband like nobody else and the fact that she is so prominent especially with the recent public sympathy over her recurring cancer makes for history.
I was honestly shocked when I heard the news break just an hour ago on Sunday. It is definitely uplifting. Who knows, maybe she can get John to sign on too, or maybe some other presidential spouses. The best part about it is that Elizabeth blamed John's reluctance to support gay marriage on the grounds that he grew up in a 1950s southern town! That was hysterical yet she couldnt have hit the nail on the dot any better. I love her for it and may she be blessed with good health.
What do you all think of this? Do you think this will create a shift among the Democratic candidates? Public attitudes?
(Im still getting over my glee in terms of how historic this is and indicative of how far we've come so quickly)

Comments are closed for this post.
But this is a post about Elizabeth, not John. Elizabeth supports marriage equality, John does not.
That said, this is a total non-issue, and if she wanted to stand up and be counted as someone courageous on this issue, she should have said something in 2004, back when being in support of gay marriage was more of a political liability.
Also, what the fuck is up with the soft-focus PR treatment here in referring to her as "the cancer-stricken wife"? Her cancer is (rightly) irrelevant to her policy positions.