Post from Citizen Blog:
"Coalition of the Homophobic"
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
On January 23rd, the U.S. cast a vote in the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) to deny consultative status to two LGBT organizations, the International Lesbian and Gay Association, and the Danish group LBL.

More than 3000 organizations hold consultative status, the only means by which NGO's may take part in discussions on UN policy.

In voting to dismiss the groups' applications, the US was joined by Cameroon, China, Cuba, Iran, Pakistan, the Russian Federation, Senegal, Sudan, and Zimbabwe.

The U.S. stance is particularly appalling in light of the fact that the US State Department has studied the need for global political assistance for LGBT people. According to Joe Solmonese, President of the Human Rights Campaign, "The State Department's 'Country Reports on Human Rights Practices' show severe human rights violations based on gender identity and sexual orientation occur around the world."

In Iran, homosexuality is punishable by death. Zimbabwe's dictator Robert Mugabe has declared gays and lesbians to be "people without rights."

Given that the LGBT rights in the U.S. are better than in many parts of the world, with Massachusetts allowing gay marriages (a right which exists outside the U.S. only in Belgium, the Netherlands, Canada and Spain), and given that a lack of LGBT consultative status at the UN will likely have the effect of countering progress on LGBT rights worldwide, it's entirely possible that the U.S.'s homophobic action at the UN will have the ironic result of increased immigration of LGBT people to the United States. I wonder if the religious conservatives influencing the Bush adminisration considered that.

Information:
"United Nations: U.S. Aligned With Iran in Anti-Gay Vote"
Link

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
par for the course
By jr Feb 23rd 2006 at 12:34 am EST
A few weeks back, one of our trolls asked that someone point out the specific areas where Bush was actively hurting the cause of civil rights. I provided what I thought was a good answer, but I realized I wanted more data. So I went to the source: the US Commission on Civil Rights.

The funny thing is, the one document I could find that spoke directly about the civil rights record of the administration was "Redefining Rights in America: The Civil Rights Record of the George W. Bush Administration, 2001-2004," written in September 2004.

However, there was a problem: the report, which had previously been made available to the public, had been removed from the web site.

I just got my copy today in the mail, and may I just say, "Damn."

Here's my favorite section:
"In another attempt to limit protections for gay men and lesbians in the workforce, in February 2004, Bush-appointed U.S. Special Counsel Scott Bloch removed all materials from the Office of Special Counsel's (OSC) Web site relating to sexual orientation discrimination in the federal government, including training guides and complaint forms. In addition, he suspended enforcement of sexual-orientation bias cases. The special counsel said that he did so in order to review and subsequently clarify his office's jurisdiction over the enforcement of nondiscrimination in federal employment. The provision in question, from the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, states that it is unlawful to discriminate against a federal employee or applicant "on the basis of conduct which does not adversely affect the performance of the employee or the applicant or the performance of others."

In other words, he needed to be sure that being gay didn't automatically make you incompetent. The thing is, appeals to the OSC is the only recourse victims of sexual preference discrimination have against the federal government, since the Civil Service Reform Act is the only civil rights or employment law governing federal workers that applies to sexual orientation.
  
Appalling but not unexpected
By Eli Corp Feb 26th 2006 at 1:07 am EST
I am absolutely appalled by this information from both the reports on what this administration has done against civil rights in America and abroad. It is shocking but unfortunatly not unexpected from previous doctrine by the Bush administration. From the FMA that conservatives continue to push to place discrimination back into the sacred Constistution to supporting the open discrimination of those brave men and women of the Armed Forces, this administration and Republican Congress has pushed back the clock on Civil rights in America. I am disgusted by the lengths to which the United States government has shown complete distain towards our international community. The fact that they placed John Bolton in as our UN Ambassador speaks volumes. I hope I never experience another tyrannical government as we have experienced for the last 6 years for the rest of my lifetime. I hope it is a lesson to all of us of the abuse of power by the conservative elite. They speak of values, but really what kind of values do the Republicans claim? Discrimination, greed, corruption, bigotry, distain for our allies and international community, pushing our problems onto future generations? Those are some great values worth celebrating? Its sad and pathetic to watch what the Republican party has done to America in just a few short years, and unfortunatly it will take Democrats many more years to clean up the mess they have created..
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress