The Big "D" Word
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
No, it's not anything obscene, or at least, not in a literal sense.

D-E-B-T, debt is a huge problem for many Americans, and members of my generation are being catapulted into it in a way that may entrap us for many years to come. I caught the tail-end of an episode of "Money Talks" on my PBS affiliate that focused on a young woman who had recently graduated from college (apparently from Northwestern) saddled with credit card and student loan debt. She reported that her friends were in similarly dire situations with some having already filed for bankruptcy. As the description of this installment, called "Graduating into Debt" says, "Credit card debt and increasing college tuition rates are leaving many graduates in financial ruin before they even get their first jobs." Young people are told, and rightly so, that a college education is the first step to attaining a more optimal job and is a stepping-stone to graduate education, which has become increasingly common and necessary for career advancement.

However, the costs of college are hard for most people to meet on their own. According to the College Board, the average yearly cost of attending a four-year public school (tuition, room & board) is $12,841, and the average yearly cost at a four-year private school is $27,677. College tuition increases have far out-paced inflation. According to Professor Ronald Ehrenberg of the Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, "during the last quarter of a century undergraduate tuition and fees have risen at annual rates exceeding the rate of inflation by an average of 2.5 to 3.5 percentage points." (Ehrenberg details the reasons for these increases, which I won't outline here but which are worth a read).

Financial aid only partially addresses the problems of affording college. Since it mostly comes in the form of loans, rather than grants, which must later be paid back, college graduates are still faced with a huge debt burden. According to Ehrenberg's article, from 2002-2003, 40% of aid was made up of grants. Grant levels have not kept pace with increasing tuition:
During the mid 1970s the average Pell grant received by students was about 46% of the average costs (including room and board) of attending a public higher education institution. Last year, the ratio was under 30% (the ratio is much lower at private institutions but they have more institutional resources for financial aid).
The National Center for Education Studies reports that the average loan amount for a student at a four-year institution of higher learning in the 2002-2003 year was $5,900.

All of this adds up to big post-undergraduate debt for students from education alone. Factor in other big-ticket purchases that people in their late teens and early twenties make via credit card--which, if not paid back on time, are subject to incredibly high interest rates--and one gets a headache thinking about these financial woes.

In light of this, countries that make more of an effort to aid in their citizens' financial burdens look pretty appealing. The Village Voice has an article addressing exactly this. As the article, called "Generation Debt: The New Economics of Being Young" says, "Fed up with uninspiring jobs and crappy, expensive apartments, young expats like [recent college graduate Joe] Moline are again discovering that life is better in Europe. The State Department estimates 3 million Americans are living abroad, a number that has doubled in the past 30 years. " Here's more from this interesting article:
Sunnee Billingsley, 29, moved to Barcelona to earn a doctorate in political science. She says she looked abroad for graduate programs to learn a second language and "experience another culture, and so I could get an education that wouldn't put me more in debt." Billingsley says Spain's strong social-welfare protections support a relaxed pace of life. "The state takes care of so much that people don't worry as much as Americans and don't spend as much on things like insurance programs and retirement accounts," she says.

Billingsley and other expats also note a friendlier attitude in Europe toward the struggles of emerging adults. Here in the U.S., college grads who move back in with their parents are maligned as "boomerang kids" and developmentally delayed "adultescents," but in Europe it is the social norm for young people to live with their folks and save money while getting their lives together.
I am all for living abroad after college, but a standard of living free of huge financial burdens should be equally attainable to young adults in the U.S. While right-wingers gripe about the European welfare state being too paternal, the average European citizen seems to live a less debt-ridden life than the average American citizen, what with state-funded education and health care being a much higher priority. The point is, it can be done, and it can be done well. It is outrageous that costs of education (and health care, etc.) and the debt they create have not been addressed in our country, yet unsurprising because of the current political climate. Issues such as this go completely ignored under the current Congress and Administration, and if Democrats brought these issues--real issues--to the table, the party could broaden its appeal.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Good post.
By TKeck Sep 10th 2005 at 12:59 pm EDT
I guess I am a "boomerang kid." Moving back in with the parents has been interesting to say the least...Better food cooked for me comes at the price of a loss of freedom. But I agree, the democratic party would find this to be a winning issue with college students and parents alike.
  
Frankly...
By Superduperficial Sep 10th 2005 at 5:01 pm EDT
...There are other issues here. There are some cases where, really, the kid is not getting a fair break.


There are many others where people today just expect a standard of living (and consuming) for themselves that is too goddamn high.


Both my parents went to Brown, and both fully on financial aid since they both came from poor backgrounds. They were both engineers, and when they graduated they were living on two engineer entry-level salaries (which is pretty good as such things go).


They lived a life, at least until their thirties when their debt was paid off, that was absolutely spartan compared to what kids today pay for -- together, they consumed less than a single art student would today. Art students, for crying out loud! The people who you'd expect to live the most austere lifestyles, since they've consciously chosen a non-lucrative career path in exchange for creative freedom!


Kids today expect too much. That's the long and short of it. Assistance to the poor for higher education is certainly not what it could be, but we've never gotten assistance to the poor right in this country in much of any capacity, so that's nothing new.


The modern college student is simply unaccustomed to making smart tradeoffs.


Similarly, colleges which give a strong value for the money are often shucked in terms of more expensive "name" colleges that may or may not be what's best for them, personally.

The average high school student does far too little research before picking which college is right for them. Well, actions have consequences.


There's no reason why college shouldn't leave you in debt. It's worth the money, in terms of what you get out of it. And if it's not worth it, then why are you going? Nobody's forcing you to, per se. Make real choices, and live with the results. :)
I agree
By elainethefirst Sep 10th 2005 at 6:21 pm EDT
with enough of what you're saying, Superduperficial. I agree that:
(1) Many college kids don't spend wisely
(2) High school kids don't do enough research into college, though part of this comes with the pressure of going to college right after high school (also, state schools are getting increasingly less affordable these days)
(3) It's good to live within a budget.
(4) Education is a worthwhile investment for an individual.

All that being said, education is also a worthwhile investment for a community, every community. Other countries' education structures reflect this.

Your criticisms are vague in the sense that they indict the average college student for specific gripes that you seem to have against the spending habits of people you know. Young people should be better educated on how to manage money well and how to not rely on a credit card. Credit card debt is a big, unaddressed problem in this country. Still, it seems like a double standard to penalize someone with lesser means for something that a person born into wealth can get away with by not supporting them in their effort to get a good and affordable education.
see, now was that a 'logical fallacy'
By jr Sep 10th 2005 at 8:24 pm EDT
Both my parents went to Brown, and both fully on financial aid since they both came from poor backgrounds. They were both engineers, and when they graduated they were living on two engineer entry-level salaries (which is pretty good as such things go).


They lived a life, at least until their thirties when their debt was paid off, that was absolutely spartan compared to what kids today pay for -- together, they consumed less than a single art student would today. Art students, for crying out loud! The people who you'd expect to live the most austere lifestyles, since they've consciously chosen a non-lucrative career path in exchange for creative freedom!

You don't see the logical fallacy, assuming that just because Horatio Alger couple A achieves reasonable success, Horatio Alger couple B should be able to as well ;)

Naw, I'm just giving you grief because, well, you deserve it sometime. But including past experiences sure seems like a legitimate means of advancing a point in conversation, doesn't it?
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress