Dating Hot Spots
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

An article on Cosmopolitan’s webpage gives readers some suggestions on where to meet guys.  Among the list are the Apple store (because “most guys are natural gadget lovers”); a Fortune 500 or tech company (“Hint: Once you’re in, join the office Super Bowl pool”); and a grad school coffee shop (because some grad programs have larger male programs, “the dearth of chicks, combined with the little free time these studious dudes have to play the field, means they’re thrilled when you seek them out.  So stop by a café near campus during exam time.”)  Desperate? (Although did I expect good advice?)

 

But the one place I really want to mention: a political rally or campaign (“The hottest political organization these days is the Save Darfur Coalition.”)  And for a political campaign, Cosmo says:

 

“The best part: Many senatorial and gubernatorial campaign teams are male-dominated.  The atmosphere is intense (you’re all working hard toward a goal: the candidate winning), and there’s a set end point (the election), which lends itself to a love-for-the-moment attitude that’s conducive to love connections.”

 

Reducing serious issues into a dating game - I think this should slightly offend any activist who takes their cause seriously. 


Reader Comments
  
Male-dominant?
By Brittany S Feb 22nd 2008 at 2:28 pm EST
agree with you that this is rather offensive; however, for a bit of a different reason. While it is true that they are making activism into a dating game, what I actually find offensive is the assumption that these organizations are male-dominant. I don’t find anything wrong with meeting people through work or through issues that you care about. On the other hand, shouldn’t a magazine such as Cosmopolitan be upset by the fact that political organizations are male dominant? First of all, I am not hundred percent sure that this is true. Secondly, if this is the case, than a magazine for woman should address this issue and focus on getting more woman involved in the political arena.

In the end though, I admit that I still read Cosmopolitan. I think most woman are intelligent enough to tell what advice to follow and what should be read for purely entertainment’s sake. At least I hope so.
Re: Male-dominant?
By Annika Feb 22nd 2008 at 5:01 pm EST
"...what I actually find offensive is the assumption that these organizations are male-dominant."

To me, the problematic thing isn't that Cosmo assumes those places are male-dominated--it's that they ARE male-dominated. To some extent, political campaigns and many grad programs are run by men, if not largely populated by men.

On a more philosophical-dating-game level (is there such a thing?), Cosmo's a bad place to look for real relationship tips, but a great place to look for stuff like the article Erika quotes--tips on how to change your personality, habits and interests in order to meet a man.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress