| By foxfire burns - Jul 6th, 2007 at 4:38 pm EDT |
Tags: Al Gore, arrest, Censorship, Harry Potter, Laura Mallory, parenting, son, Tipper Gore, youth
For decades, Tipper Gore has told parents how to raise their children. In her book Raising PG Kids in an X-Rated Society, she shamed parents who dare allow their children access to youth culture. She insisted that following her example of selecting your children’s music and TV programs for them, of chaperoning your teenaged children at concerts, etc. was the only way to ensure children would grow up right and become adults who make the right choices.
We recently saw the results of Tipper Gore-style parenting. The son Tipper Gore raised, Al Gore III, was caught endangering people’s lives by driving 100 mph on a public highway. When police pulled him over, they found in his car several illegal drugs. This was not Al Gore III’s first such experience, of course. In 2003, he was stopped for driving at night with his headlights off and police found drugs then, too. Not only has Tipper Gore raised a junkie who endangers other people’s lives, but she has raised a son who can’t even figure out that when you have a stash in your car, you don’t drive 100 mph.
Now that we’ve seen the results of Tipper Gore parenting, hopefully parents will stop emulating her example. Because Al Gore III is not the only victim.
The most psychologically damaged person I’ve ever known was a bookstore co-worker of mine I’ll call Jim. He stole money from the store, he used drugs, and he frequently snapped, unleashing a lifetime of fury on people, cussing out customers, damaging store property, and even assaulting a co-worker without provocation.
Jim once told me of something he described as his “most painful childhood memory.” He was in grade school when the movie Star Wars came out. All his peers saw the film multiple times and this movie was the topic of nearly every conversation in his school. Jim, however, missed this cultural phenomenon. His parents chose to “protect” Jim from the violence and from the occult religion of the Jedi. He was shut out of every conversation his peers had. Desperate to escape his isolation, he lied, claiming he had seen the movie. But when he tried to fake his way through conversations about the film, he failed and became the butt of laughter.
And it wasn’t just Star Wars. Through his childhood and adolescence, Jim’s parents denied him all movies, convinced movie houses were dins of sin, and they denied him all popular music. Being so uncultured, he had little in common with his peers and little chance to form healthy relationships.
Tipper Gore told millions of parents it was their duty to inflict this on their children. Parents who loved their children and refused to lock them away from youth culture were denounced as “irresponsible.”
To get around such “irresponsible parents,” Tipper had her husband, Senator Al Gore II, introduce legislation making it illegal to sell any album with a warning label to anyone younger than 18. If parents didn’t wish to go to the record store and choose their teenagers’ entertainment, the Gores would have the government force them. This legislation failed, but the Gores never ended their crusade against permissiveness. The last time Al Gore II ran for office, few were surprised he chose fellow crusader Joe Lieberman as his running mate or that, in his last debate, Gore brought up once again the horror story of the time his wife caught their children listening to the prince of darkness himself, Prince.
In 2007, of course, it has been a long time since many Americans cared what the Gores had to say about parenting. But other crusaders follow the Gores’ example, such as Laura Mallory working through the court system to remove Harry Potter books, with their pagan wizardry, from school libraries and shaming parents who allow their children to read. Hopefully, the public results of Tipper Gore’s parenting will help people see that for our children to grow up right, what they need most is a chance to enjoy their youth.

Comments are closed for this post.
I'm fairly certain their son had about as permissive an upbringing as you would find anywhere, even though this probably does damage to your strange thesis that a disciplined upbringing leads directly to a dark life of crime.
If a person can't be happy without having many mansions in their life, fine just don't go around lecturing me about energy usage. It's called hypocracy.
"Good thing they voluntarily pay extra to purchase power generated through renewable sources via the TVA's "Green Power Switch" program,"
Another similar good thing was when people in the middle ages paid indulgences to their church so they could go out and sin more. You really buy this argument?
"If a person can't be happy without having many mansions in their life, fine just don't go around lecturing me about energy usage. It's called hypocracy."
First, it's actually called "hypocrisy," with an "i," and second, there's a difference between energy usage and carbon footprints. Using non-carbon based renewable energy has a negligible environmental impact. Also, working from home offices reduces emissions from commuting. If you want to think that only people in small houses without home offices are allowed to try and arrest the greenhouse effect, then that's your problem, not the Gore's.
"Another similar good thing was when people in the middle ages paid indulgences to their curch so they could go out and sin more. You really buy this argument?"
As my old pal Joe would say: "BWAHAHAHA!! Oh, wait, you weren't kidding."
Once again, there is a difference between non-carbon renewable energy and non-renewable, carbon-heavy energy. The Gores, by purchasing renewable energy at a significantly increased cost, are contributing about as much to the overall carbon crisis as if they had a wind turbine on their front yard. The energy they use isn't contributing to the greenhouse effect, SO WHERE'S THE SIN? Your metaphor to indulgences is sophomoric and poorly reasoned--those were sold to allow people to violate doctrinal rules with impunity, whereas Green Power Switch avoids greenhouse gas emissions altogether, meaning there's no hypocrisy involved and no logical basis of comparison.
I gotta tell you Terry, this has been some of the easiest debate I've fielded in years. You're either lobbing me easy ones to help me make my point, or you're really not thinking enough about your arguments before making them here.
Gosh, you've just gotta enter the next spelling bee.
"If you want to think that only people in small houses without home offices are allowed to try and arrest the greenhouse effect,"
Anyone, rich or poor, who is foolish enough to believe that human activity has any noticable effect on global temperature fluctuations is free to do whatever they like as far as i'm concerned. That is, up to the point where they try to force me (through the law making process) to join them in their foolishness. Did you happen to see the NASA report that shows the temperature on mars is increasing at the EXACT SAME rate as earth's temperature? I wonder if those damn martians have carbon footprints that are too big. Or could it be just normal fluctuations in solar activity causing it. Hey, a lightbulb just went off in my head, maybe that's what's caused all of earth's temperature fluctuations, alternately warming and cooling, that have been going on for thousands of years now. Hmmm..I wonder. Better not tell Al Gore and his groupies though. They'd have to give up their global warming religion.
"The Gores, by purchasing renewable energy at a significantly increased cost, are contributing about as much to the overall carbon crisis as if they had a wind turbine on their front yard. "
Man, that's a big "as if" in that there sentence. I mean that "as if" is BIG. With an "as if" that big we can jump all the way from fact to fantasy. The fact is they don't have a wind turbine in their front yard. The fact is they buy their power from the local power company and that energy they buy (in stupendous, one might almost say hog-like) amounts is about as carbon heavy as it comes. And all your double talk about side investments in alternative energy companies doesn't render it the tiniest bit less carbon heavy. My dad also invests in these companies, but being an honest man, if you ask him about it he wont engage you in any carbon offset double talk. He will tell you straight out and unashamedly, he does it to make a return on his investment over time.
"Your metaphor to indulgences is sophomoric and poorly reasoned--those were sold to allow people to violate doctrinal rules with impunity"
And all your carbon offset double talk is a transparent cover to allow Al Gore to violate his own global warming doctrinal rules with impunity. But, then again, maybe you know more about the middle ages than I do. I get the feeling you would have been right at home there. You could have spent your time constructing logically slippery arguments about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Most of what you wrote has nothing to do with what I wrote, and you obviously have no idea what Green Power Switch is or does, but keep talking, I'm sure someone, somewhere will take you seriously some day.
Everything I wrote was in direct response to something you wrote. A little hard to deal with isn't it? As for being taken seriously, I'll let my posting and your posting speak for itself.
You don't go to Regent University or Bob Jones by any chance, do you?
I happen to be a mathematics major at the University of Chicago and will be transferring to Denver University this fall.
Since we're on the subject, what's your major field of study. I bet it's something really challenging and rigorous, like Gender Implications of Basketweaving Studies or Marxist Interpretations of the Post-Colonial Short Story.
And miraculously, whether or not the Gores are hypocrites has nothing to do with whether or not global warming is actually taking place.
Exactly!
The Gores may not really care about global warming, but it IS a problem. And even if they aren't doing anything serious about it, we should.
But your point about the bearing the Gores have on global warming is both accurate and appreciated.
The episode, should you ever want to download it or buy it on DVD (it was on Adult Swim just last night) is called "Bender Should Not Be Allowed on TV."
Money quote: "Most, if not all of the blame rests with the parents. That's right, you! And so I ask you this one question: Have you ever tried simply turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?"
Damn fine TV.