One more 5-4 outrage from the Roberts court
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

With Samuel Alito replacing Sandra Day O'Connor last year, the Supreme Court's right wing is a solid four person block, and this term Justice Kennedy has lined up with them in most of the key cases.  It's bad news, including today for  equality and opportunity in education.

Thanks again to all the students who stood with us to speak out against the nominations of the smiling, All-American ideologue John Roberts and the most right wing federal judge in America, Samuel Alito

About the only campaign promise that President Bush kept was to appoint Justices in the mold of Scalia and Thomas, and a range of conservatives who now have split with Bush on other issues continue to praise the Roberts and Alito confirmations as a key accomplishment by the administration. 

Progressives, and other supporters of a reasonable interpretation of the Constitution and laws of the United States, have a lot of work to do.  They need to persuade elites about the bankruptcy of the right wing vision of the law.  They also need to persuade the public on the controversial hot-button issues that underlie critical Supreme Court decisions -- issues like free speech, government surveillance, detention of alleged terrorists, criminal justice, tort lawsuits, and discrimination/ affirmative action.  Until the public sees that a right wing Supreme Court is undermining their values and interests in the day to day world, voters won't see Supreme Court appointments as an election issue, nomination battles will continue to favor the conservatives, and the right wing extremist block may grow even bigger.


Reader Comments
  
You're joking (or at least, you should be.)
By Superduperficial Jun 28th 2007 at 4:47 pm EDT
Today's ruling was a victory for anti-racism in America.
  
Wrong
By Chris Jun 28th 2007 at 4:53 pm EDT
I read the decision and feel that the it lays out a compelling statement on why the schools violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. Judging by your rant, I have a feeling you did not even read the decision.

Arguing that progressives should seek to change the court so that they care only about ends and not means is clearly counter to what being a progressive is really about.
  
from a libertarian perspective
By Ryan Crowell Jun 28th 2007 at 7:33 pm EDT
These recent Supreme Court rulings ought to be praised for, for the first time in decades, the Supreme Court upholding liberty. In its rejection of Campiagn Finance reform, protecting first amendment liberties, to limiting government-enforced discrimination when it comes to schooling.

A strict interpretation of the Constitution is one that will always secure liberty, and protect us from government force. I know progressives don't care about liberty, and would rather the government have unlimited powers to engineer society, rather then allowing free men acting with their own free will to influence their society, which is why progressivism is so dangerous to liberty. While there are some issues when right wingers stand opposed to liberty, I believe if this court upholds the Constitution as it is written, liberty will finally be restored.
Re: from a libertarian perspective
By Superduperficial Jun 29th 2007 at 2:08 am EDT
""I know progressives don't care about liberty, and would rather the government have unlimited powers to engineer society,""

Hey there, straw man, whatcha knowin'?
I came to watch your flowers growin'
Shooby dooby, feelin' groovy..
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress