Unity on Whose Terms?
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Christopher Hayes on Obama's announcement:
In his speech, Obama recited moments in American history when politics became something more than the mundane mechanics of governing and effected a true transformation of the polity: the civil war, the New Deal, the civil rights movement. But the problem is that those were moments not of unity, but of extreme polarization. The South only granted rights to black citizens under force of arms, armies of unruly war veterans gathered in Washington DC during the Great Depression to demand the government provide them with a safety net, and when Martin Luther King Jr went marching through the South, he was met with batons and firehoses and accusations that he was dividing people and stirring up trouble.

Reader Comments
  
History
By Southern Progress Feb 13th 2007 at 9:07 am EST
Well sure they do.

but what's the value in a leader who unites the nation when many believe the status quo to be King.

For instance, there's no significance in suspending civil rights during war, is there??

just a thought.
  
History
By Southern Progress Feb 13th 2007 at 9:08 am EST (Updated Feb 13th 2007 at 9:12 am EST)
Post--F-Up.....sorry
  
H
By Southern Progress Feb 13th 2007 at 9:08 am EST (Updated Feb 13th 2007 at 9:11 am EST)
h
  
Moved
By Superduperficial Feb 13th 2007 at 1:53 pm EST (Updated Feb 13th 2007 at 2:03 pm EST)
.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress