Post from Jesse Singal's Blog:
Super-Delegates?
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
MSNBC has a helpful explanation of the Democratic primary process, which is weird and includes made-up sounding terms like "super-delegate."

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
On superdelegates, and the process generally
By Kay Steiger Jan 9th 2008 at 4:02 pm EST
The Democratic primary process is a lot more complicated than the Republican one, for reasons that only sort of make sense. Candidates used to be chosen in those legendary "smoke-filled rooms" with party heavyweights. Over time, the process became more democratic (with a small d) and part of it was organized to give weight to people who didn't usually get a voice. That's why they started to stagger the primaries and include the caucus system. They figured with a mix of different kinds of competition they'd end up with the best candidate. There's a case to be made for cleaning up the system and converting it to a totally national primary, but the fear there is that the candidate with the most money will win.
Re: On superdelegates, and the process generally
By Liberaltarian Jan 10th 2008 at 10:24 am EST
And that's a pretty reasonable fear; which probably makes having a rotated or randomized primary/caucus order every four years the best solution.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress