Post from A Kat's Eye View:
Even in Canada, U.S. Squashes Speech
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
A peaceful action quickly erupted into conflict today at the U.N. Conference on Climate Change when Nia Robinson of the U.S.-based Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative was escorted from an official event of the U.S. delegation because a can of Spam "could be used as a weapon".

Robinson and her fellow members of the EJCC Youth Committee were on-hand to deliver Climate Change Survival Packs to U.S. delegates at the delegation's presentation on public-private partnerships. The Climate Change Survival Packs contain symbolic items that represent a variety of ways for Indigenous Peoples, people of color, and low-income to protect themselves from the continuing burdens of climate change, including: a face mask (air pollution), lantern (increasing electricity prices for low-income people), bug spray (increased presence of disease-carrying insects), sunscreen (heat waves), cans of Spam (threats to the subsistence of Indigenous Peoples), and a life preserver (floods).

After being surrounded and questioned as to her intentions by five UN police officers, Robinson was barred from re-entering the Bay du Nord briefing room where the U.S. delegation was convening.
"My requested removal is another sign that our government wants to continue its policies of operating bilaterally and behind closed doors," said Robinson, a native of Detroit, Mich. "The 'public' in their 'public-private partnerships' fails to include the people most affected by climate change."

One officer threatened to confiscate the camera of a reporter who was documenting the event. A high-level U . S . official referred to the event as "childish and pathetic."

And in other news...they have also now banned all politcial pins and patches from the conference center.

"One guard said that it's probably at the insistence of the US, as all the buttons criticize the Bush administration. For a nation that is not even a party to Kyoto, it doesn't seem to make much sense that they should have a say in what international NGO delegates can wear. Free speech doesn't end at the conference gates!" said youth delegate Steve Schwartz on itsgettinghotinhere.org

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Spam
By stantheman Dec 8th 2005 at 2:14 pm EST
Spam is threat to indigenous peoples??

What about the rest of us?
Re: Spam
By zackfischer Dec 8th 2005 at 4:48 pm EST
In the body the report clearly states it was the UN security people who ejected the protesters. So why does the title claim the US was quashing free speech in Canada (which doesn't have guaranteed free speech in any case)? Seems to me that this blog is prima facie incorrect.
Re: Spam
By Superduperficial Dec 8th 2005 at 5:42 pm EST
Indeed. It strikes me as superficial and unserious to lapse into hyperbole at every turn when covering this important event.
Re: Spam
By AndrewGarib Dec 9th 2005 at 12:25 am EST
Canada clearly does have a guarantee of free speech:

Link
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress