Post from Kay Steiger's Blog:
Data Says the Surge Doesn't Work
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

Kevin Drumm put up some numbers from the Brookings Institution comparing this year and last year to see if the surge is working. Unsurprisingly, in almost every objective, measurable way, things are worse now than they were in the summer of 2006. 

Still, when Petraeus  (who the washingtonpost.com calls "overrated") delivers his report on September 11, it seems likely that it will be tailored to say that we're making progress that isn't necessarily political or security-based. What's infuriating is that conservatives will just try to convince the moderates that we just need more time to allow the surge to "work."

If this is the rate that the surge is going at,  things could be even worse next year.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
not surprising
By Annika Aug 24th 2007 at 10:38 am EDT (Updated Aug 24th 2007 at 10:40 am EDT)
I've been pretty slow to come around against the war--for a long time, I felt that I didn't know enough specifics to be able to judge the difference 6 months might make.

But with evidence like this, plus reports that political Iraqi political leaders are impotent Link and CAP's clever chronicle Link of how often that "6 months more" bullshit has been pulled, looks like the only logical choice is ending the war. As Kay points out, we can't solve this problem by hoping an old plan starts to "work."
  
To be clear
By Thomas Coen Aug 24th 2007 at 11:01 am EDT
The washingtonpost.com didn't call Petraeus "overrated," it was William M. Arkin, who writes a blog for the washingtonpost.com. That's a big and important difference to note.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress