Post from Kay Steiger's Blog:
Research, Please
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

The BBC reports that women are "choosier" when it comes to mates and look for things like financial security. But here's the thing. It was a survey of 46 people at speed-dating session. A survey of 46 people is hardly scientific, and I doubt that those at a specifically targeted dating event are representative of their genders as a whole. What's more, here's what the lead researcher said:

"While humans may pride themselves on being highly evolved, most still behave like the stereotypical Neanderthals when it comes to choosing a mate.

"Evolutionary theories in psychology suggest that men and women should trade off different traits in each other and when we look at the actual choices people make, this is what we find evidence for."

I hardly thing that this has anything to do with "evolution" or "psychology" but rather cultural norms and expectations. Somebody get these people an intro to research class.  

 


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Amen.
By RBP Sep 4th 2007 at 11:47 pm EDT
See the most recent Economist article on women, directions, colors, and shopping?
  
Lighten up
By Ming Sep 5th 2007 at 12:05 am EDT
Here's the thing. This article had no pretense of representing real science or "research". It is what is known in the trade as a "human interest story." It is basically filler and requires neither analysis nor rebuttal. So your superior tone and understated sarcasm seem somehow misplaced. What are you going to do next? Criticize the grammar in the comic section?
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress