Post from Keith White's Blog:
Forced Vacation? The Case for Government-Backed Vacation Time
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

Government-backed vacation time for American workers? Courtney E. Martin, writing for The American Prospect, makes the case for Big Brother taking a cue from Big 'Bluto' Blutarsky.

Martin suggests a ‘vacation irrationality’ among American workplaces: driven by the constant need for success, they actually push their workers to be less productive by starving their R&R time.

Is this a cause to rally behind? And how can it be crafted to help all types of workers—from day laborers to cubicle warriors?

Read selections of Martin’s piece below, or read the full article here.

 



Last year, 25 percent of American workers got no paid vacation at all, while 43 percent didn't even take a solid week off. A third fewer American families take vacations together today than they did in 1970. American workers receive the least vacation time among wealthy industrial nations. And it is no thanks to the U.S. government --127 other countries in the world have a vacation law. We -- the crackberry denizens and Protestant ethic superstars -- do not.

A growing movement of nonprofits, citizen advocacy groups, and trade associations is trying to change all that. Take Back Your Time, a national organization with over 10,000 members, has declared getting a federal vacation law that guarantees Americans at least three week paid vacation a top priority issue in 2007. They are joined by Joe Robinson, author of the 2003 book Work to Live and a work/life balance coach, and the Adventure Travel Trade Association, among others.

We don't get much time at home, and at work, we feel significantly unsupported. In the latest Pew Research Center survey on work, a near majority of workers (45 percent) now says benefits are worse than they had been 20 or 30 years ago. This includes a gamut of policies -- health care, paternity leave, flextime -- all of which America is pathetically behind other industrialized countries in legislating. There has certainly been a growing conversation about these issues, thanks to the mothers' movement led by groups like MomsRising, but legislated vacation time is often last on the list of demands. (Not so surprising when you consider how difficult it is for most mothers to believe they deserve a rest.)

Not only does less vacation time mean we have less time to develop our most critical and lasting relationships with family members and friends, but our physical health is in jeopardy when we refuse to unchain ourselves from the cubicle. Vacations cut down on stress, which any medical expert will tell you is at the center of so many of America's most pernicious health crises. Two researchers at the State University of New York at Oswego showed that an annual vacation can cut the risk of death from heart disease in women by 50 percent and in men by 32 percent. Taking time out, exploring new horizons, getting away from your desk and moving around, reconnecting with close friends and family are all safeguards against burnout and depression. But this kind of rejuvenation takes time -- two weeks, most studies indicate. The average vacation in the United States is now only a long weekend, which just isn't long enough.

But it's not all about self control; it's also about government control. Why does the government need to get involved? Because in this cutthroat economic environment, vacation -- like parental leave -- goes the way of the wimp. Even if workers are employed by companies that guarantee vacation time, many of them are afraid to take advantage because they might be seen as slackers. A culture of self-sacrifice has cropped up in so many careers, leaving those who take their full two weeks looking uncommitted and ineffective.


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Yes
By Liberaltarian May 21st 2007 at 4:02 pm EDT
It'd be a lot easier to get this sort of legislation through if more of the workforce was unionized. Take the 40 hour workweek: that wasn't a result of a Congress feeling generous one day, it was the result of decades of organizing and winning the 8 hour day one workplace at a time.

There are also a lot of organizations that should by default have a union, but don't: the progressive non-profit industry (especially considering that a lot of their funding actually comes from unions). I wonder... is the Center for American Progress unionized? If not, why not?
  
No
By zach May 21st 2007 at 4:25 pm EDT
I know supporting working families is one of the foundations of progressivism, but I have a hard time believing a country with a government already mired in deficits can actually benefit from shelling out for vacations. do you really believe this will lead to an increase in productivity? i hate to go all nicholas sarkozy on you but shouldn't we learn from france, whose economy was royally screwed with measures like this?
Re: No
By Liberaltarian May 22nd 2007 at 12:41 am EDT
My homeslice Mark Weisbrot (of CEPR) has a nice dissection of France's current economic situation, and how it played into the elections.

"To the extent that international competition is being used by special interests to push down the living standards of French or German or U.S. workers - and it is - it just means that the rules for international commerce are being written by the wrong people. It is a problem of limited democracy and lack of representation for the majority, not a problem that is inherent to economic progress."

Article: Link
Re: No
By Superduperficial May 23rd 2007 at 4:52 am EDT
Gee, "The majority isn't strong enough and should be stronger!" is such a liberal refrain. ;p

Also, who's to say that standards of living shouldn't decline over time for some professions in some areas?

How much can you make as a buggy-maker today in America?
  
Yes Please
By Justin Gilmore May 21st 2007 at 11:43 pm EDT
I am in total agreement with Keith, in terms that such legislation would be much easier to produce of Unions were stronger in the United states.

That said, I think that our countries laws and regulations regarding workplaces and unions are absolutely despicable. A good first step for progressives to gain better conditions for our people while building momentum on practically all fronts would be to get legislators to produce laws which actually aid workers rights to organize, while heavily penalizing corporate entities which so-often discriminate against workers who are attempting to organize their workplace.

It's a well known fact that average wages have continually gone down since the seventies, while GDP along with productivity has skyrocketed. With these basic understandings, I do not see how you have much of a case, Zach. The United States is not France, and while US productivity continues to skyrocket, France's productivity does not, and has not for a seemingly long time. The US can capitalize on its gains and provide a better lifestyle for those within, while France might arguably not be able to at this time.

If countries were not constantly in a race to the bottom, there could be equitable standards of treatment for most workers across the US & EU divide.
Re: Yes Please
By Superduperficial May 23rd 2007 at 4:53 am EDT
Focusing on "average wages" alone is a straw-man; what those wages can *buy* has changed dramatically.

Good luck finding an IPod at any price 20 years ago.
Re: Yes Please
By jr May 24th 2007 at 6:18 pm EDT
You know, I worry a little more about food and rent than deciding between the 20 gig and 40 gig Nano.

Food prices are up 7% this year.

Where I live (and am about to leave), housing values have tripled in the past seven years, forcing homeowners to sell as property taxes soar, and making renters like me seek more hospitable environments (though I'm heading to DC, so odds are there won't be any measurable increase in hospitality towards renters).
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress