Post from Nicole's Blog:
Texas Should Be Proud, Maybe
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

On Friday, the governor of Texas issued an executive order requiring all girls entering sixth grade recieve the vaccination for the sexual transmitted disease, HPV (Crib Sheet on HPV) beginning in September 2008. 70% of cervical cancer is a result of HPV.

The cost for this vaccine runs about $360 and is covered by most insurance companies. A Texas vaccination program will cover the cost for the uninsured. Sounds perfect, huh?

Some of the controversy after the jump.



Via CNN

Merck is bankrolling efforts to pass state laws across the country mandating Gardasil for girls as young as 11 or 12. It doubled its lobbying budget in Texas and has funneled money through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators around the country.

Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. His current chief of staff's mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.

With many progressives and feminists celebrating, does the end justify the means?


Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
I think the answer
By Ben Adler Feb 5th 2007 at 2:26 pm EST
is definitely yes.
Re: I think the answer
By pdelatorre Feb 5th 2007 at 6:33 pm EST
Texas' politics-as-usual (crony-tocracy?) finally led to a positive outcome. I guess it was bound to happen some day!
  
There's nothing wrong with the means.
By Superduperficial Feb 5th 2007 at 7:33 pm EST
Sometimes, lobbyists push for things that benefit both their employers and the general public.

For instance, small business lobbies were instrumental in defeating Bush's attempt at steel tariffs.
The Big Buy!
By persiancowboy Feb 6th 2007 at 2:24 pm EST
Thats great news! Rick Perry is finally doing something positive. However like his executive order fast tracking the new coal plants in Texas, he doesn't really care about people's health.

Perry has several ties to Merck and Women in Government. One of the drug company's three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, Perry's former chief of staff. Perry also received $6,000 from Merck's political action committee during his re-election campaign.

Do you think he still would issue an executive order if he didn't receive money from Merck?

Link
  
PERRY'S FIGHT IS RIGHT!!
By Great lady from a great State.. Feb 5th 2007 at 8:11 pm EST
Couldn't agree with you more Nicole..

WE ARE QUITE PROUD!!

And I will "fight tooth & nail" to get this mandated..
not only for "our daughter's here in Texas", but for ALL young woman across this nation....

It's HIGH TIME these "Soccer Mom's" got off the Soccer fields & put their support in keeping their
daughter's HEALTHY, NOT ATHLETIC!!
Re: PERRY'S FIGHT IS RIGHT!!
By Superduperficial Feb 5th 2007 at 8:45 pm EST
Uh... you *don't* want their daughters to be athletic? May I ask why not?
  
Yes
By Southern Progress Feb 6th 2007 at 8:39 am EST
this is very, very encouraging
  
My problem with the process- Perry is a Hypocrite
By Todd Hill Feb 6th 2007 at 9:34 am EST
I have a couple of problems with the order.

First, he overrode the legislature completely. Now granted it sped up the process, but there was no consultation, no debate, no discussion on cost to Texas taxpayers, none of that. All those things would have come out had it gone through the legislative branch of Texas government. I have great concerns over how we are going to pay for this and if that bottled water tax, which was originally part of Perry's education package last year, will be revisited in order to do so. Texas has more uninsured children then most states in the United States. We can barely balance our budget and meet the needs of our state. How are we going to pay for this?

Second, he is a hypocrite. The decision is completely counter to what he and his Party stands for. Now ultimately maybe he had a come to Jesus moment and decided this was just plain the right thing to do, and if so, then great. But if that is the case you need to take the next step and allow schools to teach more then just abstinence in public schools. We need to provide children all information related to sex education, and the consequences too. This decision is an indictment on the Republican Party's knucklehead approach to sex education. Fix it!

TMH
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress