|
|
| Also listed in: Campus Progress Blog |
Tags: college affordability, education, financial aid, Harvard, Higher Education, Yale
While there is a lot of guess work about the limitations placed on endowment funds by donors, they estimate that Harvard could easily afford to do away with tuition all together:
Even if Harvard gave all of their undergraduates a free ride the school wouldn’t come close to spending even half of the interest it is receiving on just the aid-restricted portion of endowment. The full cost of allowing all undergrads to attend without any tuition, fee, or room and board costs would be $306 million. After deducting that amount the remaining $6.7 billion will still earn at least $584 million.
There is of course some thought that these changes might be a response to the increased scrutiny of college stinginess with massive endowments has gotten in Congress and beyond. Most private foundations are required to spend at least 5% of their endowments, but colleges are exempt. Even during good years they usually end up spending less.
Either way, both universities should get some applause for expanding their financial aid programs, and hopefully other schools will follow their example (hint, hint University of Texas). But maybe we should hold off on the standing ovation for now.
As for the middle class, I see no reason why a middle-class family shouldn't shell out $30-40,000 a year for a college education if they think it's worth it. If they don't, they can axe half the cost by sending their kid to community college for the first two years and transferring somewhere good. It's ridiculously easy to transfer to a top UC from community college in California, for instance. People still apply for the incoming freshman class, rather than transferring, because they think it's worth it.
If the middle class is feeling the pinch paying for college, that might be because statistically speaking, America's got a middle-class full of big spenders and wannabe high-rollers who don't save nearly enough money away. It's the genuinely poor that I actually have sympathy for, and it's those people that Harvard is giving free tuition to.
These students still make up the minority of Harvard undergraduates however. Most of the students at Harvard come from families that make over 150,000 a year and I'd be willing to wager that a fair number come from families that make over 2 or 300,000 a year. As the former President Larry Summer's pointed out, what's the point of making Harvard free for these families? It's essentially giving a free ride to those who need it the least. Harvard already is helping those most in need, I am of the opinion that at the very most the only thing it should do now is move the brightline for free education to 80,000 or 90,000. There is absolutely no reason for kids of hedgefund managers to go to school for free.