Byrd Denouces the 'Nuclear Option'
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Sen. Robert Byrd, who has been an eloquent champion of reserve and reflection in recent years while the neocons have hijacked our national government, spoke out today powerfully against the Nuclear Option, a tactic proposed by Sen. Bill Frist and (tacitly) supported by the White House that would lay the groundwork for appointing the next Supreme Court Justice by a bare majority.

"For the temporary gain of a hand-full of “out of the mainstream” judges, some in the Senate are ready to callously incinerate each Senator’s right of extended debate. Note that I said each Senator. For the damage will devastate not just the minority party. It will cripple the ability of each member to do what each was sent here to do – – represent the people of his or her state. Without the filibuster or the threat of extended debate, there exists no leverage with which to bargain for the offering of an amendment. All force to effect compromise between the two political parties is lost. Demands for hearings can languish. The President can simply rule, almost by Executive Order if his party controls both houses of Congress, and Majority Rule reins supreme. In such a world, the Minority is crushed; the power of dissenting views diminished; and freedom of speech attenuated. The uniquely American concept of the independent individual, asserting his or her own views, proclaiming personal dignity through the courage of free speech will, forever, have been blighted. And the American spirit, that stubborn, feisty, contrarian, and glorious urge to loudly disagree, and proclaim, despite all opposition, what is honest and true, will be sorely manacled."

> Read the rest of his speech
> People for the American Way and the Alliance for Justice have lots more info on the Nuclear Option

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

  
Untitled
By ZakNeiman Mar 1st 2005 at 7:31 pm EST
Rob, I think you may want to change the name of this post. Byrd's not denoucing the filibuster; he's denoucing destroying the filibuster. He's defending the filibuster.
Thanks
By rob.goodspeed Mar 1st 2005 at 9:07 pm EST
Sorry, my mistake. See corrected post.
  
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress