CampusProgress.org | The F-Word: Using the Wrong Terminology Can Change Everything

Community Blogs

Post from The F-Word:

Using the Wrong Terminology Can Change Everything

By sekai.no.kakumei - Feb 25th, 2008 at 5:26 am EST

Also listed in: Campus Progress Blog

Comments | Mail to a Friend

Tags: EC, HB 1625, Missouri

Bad? Brilliant?

You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.

Using the wrong word can cause a lot of problems, especially when it comes to reproductive rights. Case in point: Missouri’s new Plan B bill, HB 1625, which would re-classify emergency contraception (EC) as abortifacient. If this bill passes, it would make EC the same as RU486 (mifepristone) in legal terms. Therefore, pharmacies could deny dispensing EC, and there would be no legal ramifications (unlike in other states where EC is OTC for women 18 and older).

Here’s where the big problem arises: EC is not abortifacient, nor is it classified so by the FDA. If the woman is already pregnant, EC is will not terminate the pregnancy, only prevent one from occurring. This bill would be incredibly detrimental to rape victims, as they could be denied EC. And to think, it’s all because of changing one word.

~世界の革命

Reader Comments	Comments RSS
Comments are closed for this post.

I agree!

By Josh Feb 25th 2008 at 9:24 am EST

I totally agree, this is a huge problem for people who may want or need Emergency Contraception. Mostly I an concerned that the MO legislature thinks it is empowered to decide what EC is and what it does. I don't think that's their job and I know they aren't qualified to make that call.

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.