...simply doesn't exist. People will be free to visit the theme park if they like, and to avoid it if they don't.
As for privatizing Iraq's resources, what a theme park has to do with that, I do not know... but in general, this would probably be to Iraq's benefit. Any country in a volatile region with significant natural resources usually ends up devolving into warring factions fighting over those resources (Or ending up highly authoritarian, with one side having such a monopoly of power nobody can challenge their hold. Either way, not much of an opening for pluralistic democracy). The only sustainable path to development is building up human capital.
Timesonline reports that Llewellyn Werner, chairman of C3, a Los Angeles-based holding company for private equity firms, is dumping $500 million into The Baghdad Zoo and Entertainment Experience – an American-style amusement park featuring a skatepark, rides, a concert theatre, and a museum.
The park is being designed by the same firm that developed Disneyland.
Werner will retain exclusive rights to the development project. He told the Timesonline:
“I wouldn’t be doing this if I wasn’t making money,” he said. “I also have this wonderful sense that we’re doing the right thing – we’re going to employ thousands of Iraqis. But mostly everything here is for profit.”
Petraeus is a “big supporter” of the park, according to the Timesonline.
Does a Disneyland-style amusement park in a volatile, war-torn country reek of cultural hegemony and yet another excuse to privatize more of Iraq’s resources for US profit? It does to me.
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
!
As for privatizing Iraq's resources, what a theme park has to do with that, I do not know... but in general, this would probably be to Iraq's benefit. Any country in a volatile region with significant natural resources usually ends up devolving into warring factions fighting over those resources (Or ending up highly authoritarian, with one side having such a monopoly of power nobody can challenge their hold. Either way, not much of an opening for pluralistic democracy). The only sustainable path to development is building up human capital.