Write Comment
Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
Comment Title:
Your name:
Comment Text:

No HTML allowed. All HTML tags will be removed. URLs will be converted to clickable links.

Enter the text shown
in the image:
Unregistered users must be validated in order to protect this website
from content spam.
You can skip this step by registering.
   
You Are Commenting On This Post:
Prince Harry and the Press Embargo

In the United States, there's a large and growing problem of elites not serving in the military and, at the same time, the military becoming an institution dominated by the lower middle classes and by families who have a tradition of service.  Although America has lower social mobility and lots of hereditary wealth, in Britain, they have a real royal family.  But Britain's royals have a long tradition of military service.  Prince Andrew, Charles' brother, served as helicopters pilot in the Falklands. And Prince Harry, brother of Prince William and third-in-line to the throne, is serving in the British Army. 

Even though he's a royal, he's just a normal soldier and for the past ten weeks, he's been serving in Afghanistan.  But we didn't hear about until a few days ago, when the Drudge Report broke the story.  It turned out the British government got all the major media outlets in a room and requested that they not report that Harry was in Afghanistan, so he wouldn't endanger his fellow soldiers.  The embargo was broken and now Harry is probably going to the Persian Gulf.  But was it a good idea for the media to essentially be the lapdogs of the press?  I think so.

 



That's because it's important for elites to serve in the military, especially royals who virtually suck off the fat of the land and get their status, wealth and prestige entirely by virtue of their ancestors generations ago seizign power.  Sure, I oppose the mandatory military or community service for regular 18 year olds, but royal children should be in the shit as much as possible. Sure it would have been nice to see William on the front lines a la Henry IV, but getting the modern-day Prince Hal to serve should be commended. 

And so I must say that the British press did something truly patriotic by not reporting on Harry’s service for ten whole weeks.  This allowed him to serve without endangering his fellow soldiers.  It’s not like there’s some compelling reason why the public has to know that Prince Harry is serving while he’s still doing it.  And since the info is out now, we can get all the pictures and interviews we want.

It sure looks dangerous, from a liberal, freedom of the press angle, to see journalistic organizations deliberating not reporting something because the government wants them to.  But this Prince Harry situation  isn’t going to push us down the slippery slope, and if it does, we’re already too far down it anyway.  So, bravo British press!


Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress