It's not the students' - or university's - responsibility to prop up such dinosaurs. And really, what would the environmentalists in us say, especially if it's a print copy of the newspaper (online subscriptions to newspapers are pretty much a thing of the past at this point)?
We should be funding and financing not-for-profit journalism, like The Guardian across the pond, and more awesomely, like the ill-fated NewStandard, which was a hard news, investigative journalism outlet run as a co-op and getting by on donation/subscriptions: Link
The behemoths of print have long ago integrated fully into corporate America, and for that we should not weep their current state of affairs: we should be encouraging their demise and taking up the task of building real alternatives.
In Eric Alterman's column over at The Nation, he--like so many others--decries the slow, painful death of the newspaper business, citing the staff cuts, page count decreases, reduction of advertising to editorial ratios and abominable leadership of media companies by men like Illinois real estate magnate Sam Zell.
However, Alterman does present one interesting point in passing, offered to him by Vartan Gregorian, president of the Carnegie Corporation, a major non-profit organization in the U.S. Gregorian suggests to Alterman that universities could add a small fee to students' tuition which would pay for the newspaper subscription of their choice.
"This would improve the newspapers' bottom line, give their advertisers access to a coveted demographic and, if successful, would inculcate in the students the habit of newspaper reading as they approach maturity as voting citizens," Alterman writes.
Neither Alterman nor Gregorian specify whether this would be a print subscription or an online one (although many sites allow students free access), but it's an interesting idea nonetheless.
Now before attacking this idea on the grounds that it only increases students' tuition costs, which I, like everyone else, recognize are at record highs right now, just consider this for its potential to reinvigorate an ailing yet crucial facet of our democracy. If it could help save the newspaper industry, or at least keep it afloat in some incarnation, whether in print or online, wouldn't it be worth it? Isn't the free press (when it is free, of course), a vital component in a functioning democracy and worth paying a bit more for in tuition dollars?
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
!
We should be funding and financing not-for-profit journalism, like The Guardian across the pond, and more awesomely, like the ill-fated NewStandard, which was a hard news, investigative journalism outlet run as a co-op and getting by on donation/subscriptions: Link
The behemoths of print have long ago integrated fully into corporate America, and for that we should not weep their current state of affairs: we should be encouraging their demise and taking up the task of building real alternatives.