Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
You Are Replying To This Comment:
brown vs bored with education
By Rajiv
Dec 13th 2007
at 10:44 pm EST
I think because of differing socially and structurally perpetuated pathologies on education a disparity exists amongst minority groups on the value of hard work yielding economic success.
The Truly Disadvantaged by Willam Julius Wilson is takes a great look into this concept in urban america.
As far as examining my predjudices on this subject
I am not Black, Latino, and sometimes have tough time calling myself Asian. Like the columnist said, there are so many intricacies to defining race, that the term loses meaning except for the purpose of academic and social grouping. The grouping in this survey serves the purpose of dividing minority groups along affiliations to a white majority. Is this norm justly appropriated??/ Maybe not.. but was I biting any hands by saying that?... Exactly my point.
In doing a survey on the differences African Americans, Latinos, and Asians see between each other, none of these groups stand to benefit from this study.
The New York Times reported today on a poll conducted by New America Media, a coalition of ethnic news organizations, that attempted to gauge minority perceptions— about each other. The poll surveyed African-Americans, Hispanics (I use this word because the poll did not say “Latino”) and Asians on various economic and social issues, and directly asked groups questions about other minority groups. The findings are quite interesting—for example, the groups that likely have more immigrant members, Asian and Hispanic, seemed to have more faith in the so-called “American dream,” that if one works hard one will succeed economically. African-Americans, on the other hand, were far less likely to agree. Asians were also by far the least likely to indicate that their community experienced significant discrimination in the U.S., while contrastingly 92% of African-Americans responded in the affirmative.
There are obvious flaws in this survey, and the findings should certainly be taken with a grain of salt. One of the most glaring questions I have in terms of the poll’s methodology was self-identification of respondents. The three communities surveyed are extremely diverse—for example, there are a significant number of Latin and Caribbean people of African descent. Who decides which category a person fits into? Rather than relying only on these three broad groupings of “race,” the poll would be more useful if immigration status and socio-economic class background were also reported.
The poll is most interesting in its questions asked about other minority groups—attempting to measure whether the stereotypes of Black crime, undocumented Latin workers taking away jobs, and rude/racist Asian store owners actually have a hold over other minority groups. Some of the statistics are indeed disheartening. However, I think honest discussion of racism and other types of prejudice within and among communities of color is extremely important, particularly when we are trying to organize broad grassroots coalitions. We also need to be aware of how prejudice within our communities has served to bolster white supremacy and continue oppression, such as in the labor movement. But we cannot pretend that our experiences with racism are the same. We do need to examine our own prejudices and enter into honest dialogue with each other before we can unite against racial discrimination and oppression.
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
The Truly Disadvantaged by Willam Julius Wilson is takes a great look into this concept in urban america.
As far as examining my predjudices on this subject
I am not Black, Latino, and sometimes have tough time calling myself Asian. Like the columnist said, there are so many intricacies to defining race, that the term loses meaning except for the purpose of academic and social grouping. The grouping in this survey serves the purpose of dividing minority groups along affiliations to a white majority. Is this norm justly appropriated??/ Maybe not.. but was I biting any hands by saying that?... Exactly my point.
In doing a survey on the differences African Americans, Latinos, and Asians see between each other, none of these groups stand to benefit from this study.