Write Comment
Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
Comment Title:
Your name:
Comment Text:

No HTML allowed. All HTML tags will be removed. URLs will be converted to clickable links.

Enter the text shown
in the image:
Unregistered users must be validated in order to protect this website
from content spam.
You can skip this step by registering.
   
You Are Commenting On This Post:
Obsessed with hypothesizing

In Howard Kurtz’s Washington Post Media Notes column, yesterday’s article expresses the complainants of various reporters that this primary is taking way to long and they are sick of covering it.  He quotes Ana Marie Cox, a Time reporter and blogger, saying: “Of course it's historic, it's amazing, I feel lucky to be covering it. But how many more stories do I have to read, or be forced to write, about when Hillary will drop out?”

Here’s an idea: stop writing about when candidates will drop out and cover more important things, like the issues.  Granted it’s important to cover the developments of the race, but it is unnecessary to over-saturate coverage by hypothesizing over when she will drop out.  These stories aren’t important.  What’s the point in obsessing over the hypothetical – just wait until we find out and in the meantime, do your job and don’t complain about it.   


Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress