i agree with much of what that article said. thanks for the link. as i said i am not anti-feminist and certainly not conservative. the area that concerns me is not the current demographics of occupational and educational achievement, rather than the trend. GAPS are not as great of concern to me as absolute measures of school attendance, graduation, etc. and it seems that the fact that girls are doing better in school (which is excellent) is overshadowing that male students are being over-diagnosed with ADD, more prone to discipline problems, etc. I don't feel feminism has anything to do with this, the culprit is simply poor school design. i also think it is unfortunate how feminized the teaching profession is (the bulk of teachers are female). i doubt female students would tolerate it if school teachers were disproportionatley male, and I think the same standard should apply for male students
I just read Christina Hoff Sommers' fascinating book The War Against Boys. As a male with a keen interest in education policy and pedagogy in general, I found her book to be an honest and compassionate analysis of a boy's plight in the American classroom. The book is by no means perfect, as I feel she is far too critical of second-wave feminism and far too sympathetic to the "culture of violence" that dominates the social and imaginary lives of boys. But the majority of her book is excellent, and includes statistical insights into the disciplinary, academic, and cognitive problems that are becoming a staple of "boyhood," as well as some conservative solutions (rote pedagogy, strict discipline, and single-sex classrooms) that made a lot of sense to this liberal.
Anyone interested in the health of America's young men or of education in general should read this book. I also recommend Antonio Gramsci's (the famed Itallian Marxist and father of the concept of "Cultural Hegemony") prison notebooks on education, in which he claims that to be politically liberal is to be pedagogically conservative. I believe there is much truth to that statement; the problem with traditional education was not in its form, but in its restriction to the wealthy elite. The more I read on the state of American education, the more I'm inclined to believe that mainstream progressivism is not in line with the most effecient approaches to education. The answer is not education for all, but quality education for all. Anyone agree? Disagree? Bueler? Bueler? Anybody?
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
!
