Write Comment
Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
Comment Title:
Your name:
Comment Text:

No HTML allowed. All HTML tags will be removed. URLs will be converted to clickable links.

Enter the text shown
in the image:
Unregistered users must be validated in order to protect this website
from content spam.
You can skip this step by registering.
   
You Are Replying To This Comment:
You hear this mentioned a lot...
By Superduperficial Aug 10th 2007 at 6:48 pm EDT
...The idea that LGBTQ POC issues are ignored by the mainstream gay establishment.

I think that's only half right. There are definitely an additional subset of issues that many LGBTQ people of color face that white gays and lesbians don't. That said, those issues are often not the kind of thing where government has a strong role to play.

I agree that homophobia in many minority communities is a major problem. I disagree that there's any specific government policy that we can enact to force people to be tolerant.

It's the kind of thing that has to be fought in the private sphere, first and foremost. And this is where the 'mainstream' gay community especially falls down, in fighting for gay and lesbian people of color in that arena.

One major issue I had with the debate, though - only Barack Obama had to face the question about homophobia in the black community, as if he somehow has more standing to speak out against homophobia in the black community than the other candidates. I thought that was a patently racist way of handling the questioning, and the other candidates should have had to face the same question.
You Are Commenting On This Post:
The Gay Debate
It's significant progress that Democratic candidates were willing to devote an entire debate (or "conversation" as it was billed) to the issue of gay rights. Granted, the evening ended up mostly centering on the issue of gay marriage, even though there are a number of issues concerning the GLBT community that weren't even touched.


The Family Research Council (Action division) made sure to send out an email that said, "Joining a debate that caters to only 4 [percent] of the voting population--and highlights a behavior that a majority of Americans still consider "morally wrong"--carries obvious risks. So why the primetime pandering?" The FRC backed this up with polling numbers where anywhere from 28 to34 percent of the population says  they'd be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports gay rights. The number of self-identified evangelical or born-again Christians totaled 23 percent in 2004. Meanwhile, those that support "full" marriage rights for gays are polling around 40 percent.

So it seems that progressive candidates are "pandering" to a larger minority of the population than the conservative candidates do.

Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress