Write your comment in the form below. Be sure to 'Preview' your comment to make sure that it will appear as you want it to.
You Are Replying To This Comment:
Re: Why should they do away with tuition, exactly?
By crimsonstudent
Jan 10th 2008
at 9:47 pm EST
I agree with the post above. What is the logic in Harvard making tuition free for everyone? They very easily could and a little bit of research would show that they have admitted that in the past. But to what end? It's already free for those families who make under 60,000 a year and it is going to become very cheap for families that make between 60,000-80,000 next year.
These students still make up the minority of Harvard undergraduates however. Most of the students at Harvard come from families that make over 150,000 a year and I'd be willing to wager that a fair number come from families that make over 2 or 300,000 a year. As the former President Larry Summer's pointed out, what's the point of making Harvard free for these families? It's essentially giving a free ride to those who need it the least. Harvard already is helping those most in need, I am of the opinion that at the very most the only thing it should do now is move the brightline for free education to 80,000 or 90,000. There is absolutely no reason for kids of hedgefund managers to go to school for free.
The conservative Center for College Affordability and Productivity has a great post up explaining why we shouldn’t be overly impressed by Harvard and Yale’s recent decisions to spend more of their massive endowments on financial aid.
While there is a lot of guess work about the limitations placed on endowment funds by donors, they estimate that Harvard could easily afford to do away with tuition all together:
Even if Harvard gave all of their undergraduates a free ride the school wouldn’t come close to spending even half of the interest it is receiving on just the aid-restricted portion of endowment. The full cost of allowing all undergrads to attend without any tuition, fee, or room and board costs would be $306 million. After deducting that amount the remaining $6.7 billion will still earn at least $584 million.
There is of course some thought that these changes might be a response to the increased scrutiny of college stinginess with massive endowments has gotten in Congress and beyond. Most private foundations are required to spend at least 5% of their endowments, but colleges are exempt. Even during good years they usually end up spending less.
Either way, both universities should get some applause for expanding their financial aid programs, and hopefully other schools will follow their example (hint, hint University of Texas). But maybe we should hold off on the standing ovation for now.
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
!
These students still make up the minority of Harvard undergraduates however. Most of the students at Harvard come from families that make over 150,000 a year and I'd be willing to wager that a fair number come from families that make over 2 or 300,000 a year. As the former President Larry Summer's pointed out, what's the point of making Harvard free for these families? It's essentially giving a free ride to those who need it the least. Harvard already is helping those most in need, I am of the opinion that at the very most the only thing it should do now is move the brightline for free education to 80,000 or 90,000. There is absolutely no reason for kids of hedgefund managers to go to school for free.