Whoa whoa whoa. Minnesota, Nevada and California all have Republican governors. Minnesota and Nevada have both Democratic and Republican senators. They're hardly "leftist dominated."
There's a significant difference between blaming your cold on the government and recognizing the importance of reinforcing a state's infrastructure. Waiting for a disaster and relying on big earmarks to clean things up is hardly responsible fiscal conservatism.
With the weird and slightly apocalyptic weather and flooding recently (DC is like 70 right now), I have some disjointed thoughts about conversations that look place after that bridge in Minneapolis collapsed. Here's why:
"This indicates to me there might have been a structural weakness over the years."
I know the Minneapolis bridge collapse had nothing to do with waether, but that event did trigger discussions about state infrastructure, budget priorities, and the status of our bridges, roads, and other engineered structures. Alternet.org (in an article that HB pointed out to me) theorized that fiscal conservatism and a reluctance to invest in infrastructure were at least partly to blame.
Is this a stretch? The article claims that "short sighted public policy" had a hand in a number of events:
A bridge collapse in California the day before Minneapolis, the explosion of an 80-year-old steam pipe in Manhattan a few weeks before, the collapse of a section of tunnel in Boston, and lastly but most importantly, the levee failure in New Orleans.
Classic conservatism values small government and prizes cutbacks in spending. In response to the Nevada flooding, an onsite enginner state that the earthen levees used there were “the least strong and the least expensive” of the various materials used different forms of levee construction.
Thoughts?
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
!
There's a significant difference between blaming your cold on the government and recognizing the importance of reinforcing a state's infrastructure. Waiting for a disaster and relying on big earmarks to clean things up is hardly responsible fiscal conservatism.