On (not) apologizing for lynching
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
Of the 15 senators who have refused to co-sponsor the anti-lynching bill, my less-well-known home senator, Jon Kyl (R) was among them. He argued that he never co-sponsors "sense of the Senate" resolutions. Below is the text of the letter I wrote that was published in The Arizona Republic and sent to Sen. Kyl.

I read with disgust Sen. John Kyl's excuse as to why he, like 85 other senators to date, felt it beneath him to co-sponsor Senate Resolution 39 ("Senate plans lynching apology," Monday).

This bipartisan resolution officially apologized for the Senate's refusal to pass anti-lynching bills proposed in hundreds of House bills and by seven different presidents.

To say with a single voice that the Senate was in error for its gross misconduct in failing to protect the lives of thousands of Americans in the 19th and 20th centuries — as the resolution puts it, failing the Senate's "minimum and most basic of federal responsibilities" — seems a bit higher in priority than adhering to some abstract principle about not endorsing "sense of the Senate" resolutions.

On some issues I disagree with Kyl's votes and take solace in the democratic process. In this case, I am ashamed that he purports to represent the people of Arizona.

Reader Comments

Comments are closed for this post.

No comments have been written yet.
Campus Progress

Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.

Campus Progress