While much of the feedback Sarah and I received on our “Islamofascism” crib sheet was poorly articulated vitriol, I wanted to share an email exchange I had this week with CP.org reader Scott Malensek. Scott is a featured writer at New Media Journal Online and contributor to Flopping Aces. Read our conversation on the helpfulness of terms like “Islamofascism” and the supposed homogeneity of contemporary terrorists after the jump.
Annika,
I agree the term Islamofacist can be offensive, and a better description is needed, but "anti-Western Salafist jihadism" is just a completely useless idea. It's so useless it's silly. How about some other options? I mean, you made a great case in the 1400 word article, but only suggested 4 words in a useless combination.
Yeah, I'm back finally. To those of you who didn't read this blog over the summer, and so don't know what I'm talking about, I forgive you. It's hard enough keeping track of the staff around here. Anyways, apparently David Horowitz passed through campus, but after Ahmadinejad, no one really cared at all. TPMtv's got the goods.
Apparently, some states have elections in odd-numbered years. Freaks. Anyways, about 60 of my fellow Columbia Democrats knew about this wierd practice, and are in Kentucky right now campaigning for Steve Beshear. You can follow their progress here and here.
Two non-Columbia stories: In the Friday dump, Senators Kennedy and Enzi announced they're putting off changes to the NCLB at least until early next year (and one would expect, 2008 being an election year, that it will likely be pushed off until after the election). Frankly, they've had years to write good legislation on this, so the deadline excuse doesn't fly. They can even start with the crib sheet Zach Marks and I wrote. We'll let them take credit for the ideas.
In butt news: this happened. I think it's an inspired idea.
But the larger agenda is create a national movement to stand up to the coalition between Islamo-fascists and American liberals at home who are running interference for the terrorists. [*] The coalition attacking Islamo-fascism Awareness Week extends from the Iranians and CAIR through the Revolutionary Communist Party to Campus Progress (an offshoot of the Hillary-Soros-Podesta operation) and College Democrats.
You gotta hand it to David Horowitz. He’s compiled a roster of speakers for Islamofascism Awareness Week that will keep you up at night. You got the laptop bombardier (Michael Ledeen), the radical Zionist (Daniel Pipes), the occasional anti-Semite (Ann Coulter), the man-on-dog guy (Rick Santorum), the slavery apologist (Michael Medved), and on and on. Reads kind of like a who’s who of CP’s own “Know You Right-Wing Speakers” series.
Well here’s another for the list: Nonie Darwish, the self-styled “Arab feminist.”
Inspired by our recent blog discussion about David Horowitz's latest crazy campaign against decency, reason and open dialogue? Want to speak out against the divisiveness of "Islamo-fascism Awareness Week"?
With just another week before David Horowitz's Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week sweeps campuses across the nation, I thought I'd run down what students should expect.
According to Horowitz, the event is designed to "confront the two Big Lies of the political left: that George Bush created the 'war on terror' and that global warming is a greater danger to Americans than global jihad and Islamic supremacism."
The event will feature a selected film screening, including Islam: What the West Needs to Know, which explicitly paints Christianity and the West as moral do-gooders and Islam as an evil propagator of state-sponsored terrorism.
In addition, the event will be circulating a petition that "forces students and faculty to declare their allegiances: either to fighting our terrorist adversaries or failing to take action to stop our enemies," according to The Islamo-Fascism student guide.
Other events of the campaign include sit-ins at Womens Studies Programs to protest the "brutal and inhumane treatment [of women] in the Islamic world," and memorial services for "victims of Islamic terror."
Click here to see if your campus is participating in this bigoted, right-wing, racist scare campaign.
In response to the Horowitz campus campaign, protestors hung "Hate Muslims? So Do We" posters at GW, in an attempt to satirize the campaign's participants. For more about the poster see here and here. Michelle Malkin even picked up the story, calling the poster a “fake hate crime,” and derisively calling the creators “left-wing punks.”
The students who canvassed GW’s campus with anti-Muslim posters Monday sent a letter to the GW Hatchet today admitting their role in the controversy.
We’d all realized that the posters were a satirical shot at Campus Progress’ archenemy, the Young America’s Foundation, which is sponsoring Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week at 140 campuses around the country from October 22-26, including GW where Campus Progress’ other archenemy David Horowitz will be speaking. But at least now we know who the students responsible for the posters were. One was Adam Kokesh, “a graduate student and Iraq War veteran, [who] gained celebrity over the past year because of his vocal opposition to the war.”
Kokesh and six other students wrote in an e-mail to the Hatchet:
"It is to our great dismay that the student body and the media missed the clear, if subtle, message of our flier: the hyperbolic nature of the flier was aimed at exposing Islamophobic racism.
There’s still a great debate raging on Jenny Odegard’s original blog post on this Monday about whether this satire is funny, whether racism is ever funny, and shitting on Paris Hilton.
Please remember that Campus Progress' terms of use do not allow promoting or endorsing any particular political party or candidate for office. Posts or comments that do this will be deleted.
Posts
